• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Paper F5 Dec 2010 exam was

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA PM Performance Management Forums › Paper F5 Dec 2010 exam was

  • This topic has 183 replies, 102 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by AvatarAnonymous.
Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 184 total)
← 1 … 4 5 6 … 8 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 14, 2010 at 8:17 am #74632
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    yes, I had same results πŸ™‚

    I had the same results too. πŸ™‚

    December 14, 2010 at 8:30 am #74633
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • β˜†

    Ummm so i got my labour variance calculations right
    The way i saw it
    it was 750 Tvs and 650 Plasmas
    2,200 hours worked by permanent workforce, and total labour variance was 6,050 (A) for the temporary workers

    2 hours on Tv and 1.5 on Plasma
    So total hours worked – 2,475. Hours worked by temporary workers is (2,475-2,200) = 275 hours.

    Labour rate variance is 275 * $18 = $4,950
    Labour efficiency variance is 275 * ($18-$14) = $1,100 ($14 is the standard rate)

    Total is $6,050

    And also people sayin the optimal production is 1200 and 800 somethin are wrong because you can’t calculate shadow prices that way. I got the same 1200 and 800 something, but i have heard that we will get atleast 6-8 marks for defining objectives and workings. And maybe a mark or two for shadow price if we show the method, even if our product mix is wrong.

    Question 1 i expect atleast 12-14 and around 18 if my labour calculations are correct
    Question 2 atleast 16-18
    Question 3 max 8 marks
    Question 4 was a gift, i expect atleast 16-18
    And Question 5, ummm idk, around 12-14?

    IT was an easy paper but very unexpected

    December 14, 2010 at 8:36 am #74634
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    @ivenny said:
    OMG.. My answer was x=828.57 and y=1,257.15 πŸ™
    but the binding constranits is it:
    1. 3x + 2y = 5000
    2. 4x + 5y = 9600

    We`ve got the same figures. I hope we are right.

    December 14, 2010 at 8:42 am #74635
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    I think there were 4 constraints in q3?

    2 constraints for materials
    1 constraint for skilled labour
    1 for Lotion max demand <2000

    no>?

    December 14, 2010 at 8:47 am #74636
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    I think there were 4 constraints in q3?

    2 constraints for materials
    1 constraint for skilled labour
    1 for Lotion max demand <2000

    no>?

    Yes, 4 constraints.
    Do you remember what was contribution maximise equation?

    December 14, 2010 at 8:51 am #74637
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    Yes, 4 constraints.
    Do you remember what was contribution maximise equation?

    no, but I got l=400 ,c=1400 or somethiing like that

    I think contribution was given in question though, I didn’t calculate it

    December 14, 2010 at 8:59 am #74638
    Avatarivenny
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    I think there were 4 constraints in q3?

    2 constraints for materials
    1 constraint for skilled labour
    1 for Lotion max demand <2000

    no>?

    Yes Marcin, there were 4 constraints in Q3(actually should be 5 constraints last one should be x,y >=0)and 2 were binding constraints were contributed maximize equation which as follows:-
    1. 3x + 2y = 5000 grams -material
    2. 4x + 5y = 9600 minutes -labour
    thus, the answer should be cream (x)=828.57 and lotion (y) =1257.15
    The maximized contribution therefore : C=9x+8y =$17,514.33
    From above equation we can get the shadow price for material was $1.84 and slack was 142.86 grams.

    Hope all friends can pass the exam πŸ™‚

    December 14, 2010 at 9:00 am #74639
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    Yes, 4 constraints.
    Do you remember what was contribution maximise equation?

    no, I dont remember unfortunately..

    but my optimum plan was @ 400 and 1400 or something like that..

    well, I lost 6 marks on shadow price+ slack

    (but I gained 0.5 mark on non negativity equation:))

    December 14, 2010 at 9:09 am #74640
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    @ivenny said:
    Yes Marcin, there were 4 constraints in Q3(actually should be 5 constraints last one should be x,y >=0)and 2 were binding constraints were contributed maximize equation which as follows:-
    1. 3x + 2y = 5000 grams -material
    2. 4x + 5y = 9600 minutes -labour
    thus, the answer should be cream (x)=828.57 and lotion (y) =1257.15
    The maximized contribution therefore : C=9x+8y =$17,514.33
    From above equation we can get the shadow price for material was $1.84 and slack was 142.86 grams.

    Hope all friends can pass the exam πŸ™‚

    ok, so i have it all wrong…

    my constraints were:
    3Creams + 2 lotions < 5000
    1cream + 0.5 lotion<1600

    December 14, 2010 at 9:12 am #74641
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    Does anyone know when ACCA will publish exam answers?

    December 14, 2010 at 9:14 am #74642
    Avatarsharon1507
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 13
    • β˜†

    Im very demotivated….in fact the paper wasn’t that difficult but i’ve done many mistakes because i think i was too stressed!!!
    I’ve try all my possible during this semester and yet it was as if useless…
    A gud idea hw 2 change zis state of mind???help plz thx!!!!

    December 14, 2010 at 12:37 pm #74643
    Avatarivenny
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    ok, so i have it all wrong…

    my constraints were:
    3Creams + 2 lotions < 5000
    1cream + 0.5 lotion<1600

    Dun so disappointed, so long as you have working still can get mark πŸ™‚

    December 14, 2010 at 12:45 pm #74644
    AvatarKeshaM
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 36
    • β˜†

    I didnt indicate the question
    numbers attempted on the front cover of the
    booklet? Is that can be a problem?

    December 14, 2010 at 12:51 pm #74645
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • β˜†

    My permutation and combination did not work. I actually prepared and thought topics like Learning curve, Throughput, Risks and Uncertainty, would tested.
    Anyway, I attempted ABC, Variance, PM, and faint trial on others.

    I hope I will pass oooooooooooooooooooo

    Merry Xmas and a happy new year in advance.

    December 14, 2010 at 1:09 pm #74646
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • β˜†

    Paper was qute easy but still am not sure am gona pass it :!

    q:1 was easy except labour variances
    q:2 guys can u tell me how many of u prepare table calculations for financial measures like i ddnt prepare it seperatly just did in each heading e.g in sales growth i performd calculations about turnover etc… is it ok πŸ˜‰
    q:3 was a bit** didnt attempt it
    q:4 was easy
    q:5 is also easy excpet part 1

    December 14, 2010 at 1:41 pm #74648
    AvatarIrfan
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    the paper wasn’t difficult but i found it lengthy. I couldn’t complete it. Lost a complete 20 mark question due to it:(

    December 14, 2010 at 2:36 pm #74649
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 18
    • β˜†

    If i Pass THANKX TO JOHN if I FAIL still THANKS to JHON…whtever i did was owing to OPEN TUITION..but john plz guide students to calculate variance in a little quick way cuz i knew wht was going on with variance and what to do….but it was taking too much time!!!

    December 14, 2010 at 5:18 pm #74650
    Avatarmichael13011991
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 45
    • β˜†β˜†

    OMG…..the paper was time pressuring…..i totally revised linear programming only to mess it up…got all the points…know how to calculate shadow price and slack but i included the FIXED COST and used that as one of my optimum point only afterward to find out that it was irrelevant!!!!! will ACCA punish me twice in part B for getting the points wrong?

    December 14, 2010 at 5:42 pm #74651
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • β˜†

    pretty nice paper….was really scared b4 the exam. F5 is a done deal to God’s glory.

    December 14, 2010 at 5:46 pm #74652
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 16
    • β˜†

    @grindmastah said:
    linear programming

    x= 825, y = 1275

    I have got C = 1066.67 and L = 1066.67
    Question 3 Linear programming
    Equations: (lines on the grapth!)
    4C+5L=9600
    3C+2L=5000
    C+0.5L=1600

    December 14, 2010 at 6:14 pm #74653
    Avatarbridmw
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 130
    • β˜†β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    We`ve got the same figures. I hope we are right.

    I believe this is what I got also.

    Out of F5, F7 and F9 this diet – F5 definitely the easiest and least time pressured paper.

    December 14, 2010 at 6:56 pm #74654
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • β˜†

    q:2 guys can u tell me how many of u prepare table calculations for financial measures like i ddnt prepare it seperatly just did in each heading e.g in sales growth i performd calculations about turnover etc… is it ok????

    December 14, 2010 at 7:25 pm #74655
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • β˜†

    Give mooorrrrree tiiiiiiimmmmeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!

    December 14, 2010 at 8:00 pm #74656
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    We`ve got the same figures. I hope we are right.

    same for me… that’s 3 of us lol. though i rounded of the slack to 143 grams.

    the thing is i forgot to tick on the front of the papers which answers i have attempted, though i have done all of them will they still check my papers and could get marks????

    December 14, 2010 at 8:13 pm #74657
    Avatarbridmw
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 130
    • β˜†β˜†

    @rochelleobar19 said:
    same for me… that’s 3 of us lol.

    Not much hope for you as an accountant – it’s actually 4.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 184 total)
← 1 … 4 5 6 … 8 →
  • The topic ‘Paper F5 Dec 2010 exam was’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options: Β β€œRead the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gyette on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AllisonHoang on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • zuluthanda1@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 Β· Support Β· Contact Β· Advertising Β· OpenLicense Β· About Β· Sitemap Β· Comments Β· Log in

Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy
Settings Accept all
Cookies
Choose what kind of cookies to accept. Your choice will be saved for one year. Read our cookie policy
  • Necessary
    These cookies are not optional. They are needed for the website to function.
  • Statistics
    In order for us to improve the website's functionality and structure, based on how the website is used.
  • Experience
    In order for our website to perform as well as possible during your visit. If you refuse these cookies, some functionality will disappear from the website.
  • Marketing
    By sharing your interests and behavior as you visit our site, you increase the chance of seeing personalized content and offers.
Save Accept all