• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** P5 June 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA APM Advanced Performance Management Forums › *** P5 June 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

  • This topic has 77 replies, 49 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by al33.
Viewing 25 posts - 51 through 75 (of 78 total)
← 1 2 3 4 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 9, 2016 at 9:48 am #321388
    hafiz
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    agreed

    June 9, 2016 at 10:33 am #321400
    lynnecart
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 27
    • ☆

    @gvanca said:
    On the income statement side, operating lease charges should be added back.

    I have just read this on ACCA technical article RELEVANT TO ACCA QUALIFICATION PAPER P5. So we were correct to add operating lease charge back

    Awesome – thanks!

    June 9, 2016 at 12:42 pm #321440
    Raja
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    Hi

    For Q1 part D) i kno dat it had asked for ROCE calculation but i dont think so if it asked for any suggestion for measures?
    Can you or anyone please confirm because i dont remember the suggestion part to this question.

    Many thanks in advance

    June 9, 2016 at 12:45 pm #321442
    Raja
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    @rushzer said:
    Much better paper especially in terms of timing and examiner has probably understood the previous papers were a bit too long to finish within 180 mins.

    1.
    a) Performance Evaluation – 14 m
    b) 2 Measures on Rev/ OP sqm – 8 m
    c) RI to replace as main measure over Operating Profit Margin – 8 m
    d) ROCE Calculation and suggestion of another techniques (New Store) – 8 m
    e) Loyalty Programme/ IS Benefits – 8 m
    f) Structure of Answer – 4 m

    2.
    a) BPR and 3 Initiative Evaluation – 14 m
    b) Reward System Evaluation – 11 m

    4.
    a) EVA Calculations for B/G – 10 m
    b) EVA for Divisional Performance – 7 m
    c) Value Based Management – 8 m

    Hi

    For Q1 part D) i kno dat it had asked for ROCE calculation but i dont think so if it asked for any suggestion for measures?
    Can you or anyone please confirm because i dont remember the suggestion part to this question.

    Many thanks in advance

    June 9, 2016 at 1:54 pm #321456
    ayunaa
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Guys, has anyone used Mckinsey 7s in evaluation of BPR? E.g. bpr effect on systems was …, on staff-… and so on

    June 9, 2016 at 2:42 pm #321468
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    what about the ROCE calculation, I think I have 33% which is above the target roce of 30%

    June 9, 2016 at 2:46 pm #321469
    Alexandra
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    @ raja

    Hi,

    the requirement was not to suggest alternative measures but to asses the use of expected ROCE as a tool for decision – making

    June 9, 2016 at 2:48 pm #321470
    Alexandra
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    @AmaraFofanah said:
    what about the ROCE calculation, I think I have 33% which is above the target roce of 30%

    I think you mean 13% was the target ROCE and I got for the Medium and High demand a higher ROCE, but for the Low demand, a lower value

    June 9, 2016 at 2:50 pm #321472
    leilagelman
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I used 7s McKinsey in evaluation BPR as well.
    EVA both negatives. No adjustments to CE.

    June 9, 2016 at 4:34 pm #321538
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    @Alexandra said:
    I think you mean 13% was the target ROCE and I got for the Medium and High demand a higher ROCE, but for the Low demand, a lower value.

    Am sorry it was 13% the targeted ROCE I got 13.3% more than the target as we have to add all the three possible outcome.

    June 9, 2016 at 5:37 pm #321590
    rawfay
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Also the commentary for ROCE calculation was not required instead the examiner only requires comments on the use of expected values.

    What was the possible answer for BPR question’s part II ?

    June 9, 2016 at 6:28 pm #321650
    ayunaa
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I applied Mckinsey 7s model to evaluate how BPR affected systems, staff, skills, etc., and in each area tried to propose new performance metrics or at least comment on possible issues, e.g. possible conflicts due to downgrade of supervisors

    update: sorry, did not notice you asked about the 2 part. I did not do it due to lack of time, shame

    June 9, 2016 at 6:37 pm #321660
    ldorey
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    WACC for EVA was definitely 11%. The cost of debt was already post tax so it did not need to be adjusted (1-t). Ratio of Debt to Equity was 1:3 so 25%: 75%.

    Adjusting the Capital Employed figure….. the movement on the provision in the year should have been added back.

    I ended up with one negative and one positive EVA for the divisions.

    Also noted they had two different rates for depreciation, so add back Book value of Dep’n, less economic dep’n.

    Fairly sure I would have at least 1 or 2 things wrong in that calculation. Surprised it was worth 10 marks though, as it didnt seem to need narrative (description of results was next question)

    June 9, 2016 at 7:35 pm #321702
    rasib
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Q1- part a- analysis of report that was gud alot to write but some of my friends forget to link it with boards problem of short-ism
    Part 2 was little confussing so first i calculate both ratios and then disscuss it on both negative n positive way
    Part 3 was also easy so i write alot
    Part 4 i calculate Roce then make a chart of probabilties and compare it with targeted also comment
    Part 5 was also easy i linked it with companys goals and write alot

    Q4 part a- calculate but i got positive npv and calulation of wacc is not gud i thnk how ever i explain all exemptions
    Part b was awsome
    Part c was ok

    Q3 time was only 20 min left so i didnt attempt this question that gud just main points 🙁

    June 9, 2016 at 7:41 pm #321708
    rasib
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Yup i thnk its just to calculate roce for three probabilties available taking there revue divided by same capital employed
    Then apply probabilties and compare with targeted

    June 9, 2016 at 11:17 pm #321786
    rawfay
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    How did you guys calculate the expected ROCE?

    I did it like this:

    Multiplied each operating margin and revenue with their respective probabilities to calculate the expected values, then applied that expected margin to the revenue to calculate the operating profit. Then the usual calculation…of ROCE

    June 10, 2016 at 4:09 am #321808
    rushzer
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Well yes, in the case it was mentioned that CEO is expecting comments to such measures.

    June 10, 2016 at 10:21 am #321908
    ebtuci2903
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Does anyone know when will be published the answers of the exam paper?

    Thanks

    June 10, 2016 at 10:33 am #321910
    tumsiimed
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    toughest exam I have ever attempted in all my ACCA sittings. even tougher than P4 and P2. Question 2 on BPR was a very technical paper and required an open approach beyond the presented scenario. question one was time consuming to be able to evaluate divisional performance.
    I wonder to see your comments on the ease of the exam while it was a dead attempt to me. Praying for a pass mark though!!!!!!

    June 10, 2016 at 11:39 am #321957
    acca0393
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 29
    • ☆

    It was a doable paper although time pressured. it was my third attempt and still am not sure of a pass. To become an affiliate I need to pass P5 and P7. Am not sure I passed this P5 so I will study P7 between now and September. When results are out next month, I will know whether I do both or just P7 in September.

    June 10, 2016 at 6:47 pm #322164
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    Woo.. I can’t really wait for results to come out.. July seems too far. I wish results were coming out next week. Iam keeping my fingers crossed.
    I only attempted 75%. Iam really upset. Time really did me bad…

    June 10, 2016 at 8:53 pm #322222
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    The exam was not bad this time. I think I was able to write better answers this time around.

    June 11, 2016 at 4:12 pm #322420
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    The question was to comment on the report, so need to comment on the company performance except waste of time.

    June 12, 2016 at 2:36 pm #322591
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Question 1(i) was about the discussion of the performance report in Appendix 1

    June 13, 2016 at 3:55 am #322665
    tracynht
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    I got the positive EVAs, i guess this is wrong as it is likely every one got negative ones, but i dont know how so…the most costly expense was the operating expenses and i was wondering if those are cash or non-cash exps..I wrote an assumption that those exp would be non-cash to add them back in EVAs, which partly made my EVAs positive….anyway, i hope the marker doesnt put it as a negative point :((..This time i finished all other questions so i hope those would help to make me 50 mark pass …Finger crossed!!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 51 through 75 (of 78 total)
← 1 2 3 4 →
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • NirajNathani99 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AKN1989 on Linear Programming – Maximum contribution – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Motsotase910 on Contingent Assets and Liabilities – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on ACCA F2 Key to success

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in