- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by .
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › P2- Chapter 01, IFRS 3 – Eg: 3 (Viesturs and Baiba)
Mr.Mike,
everything is very clear,but, feel one doubt,
We measured deferred payment @ PV, according to the IFRS – 3.
in Eg: 03, Contingent liability (of 2,000,000) is also measured @ PV, whereas, the Standard say to measure contingents @ FV as of the date…
Pls advice……
further, Baiba’s profit become 2,200,000… is there necessity of re- assessment and adjustment…
Thanks in advance
BR,
Priyantha
Is fair value in this context not the same as present value?
Yes, when the additional 200,000 became apparent, the adjustment is not applied retrospectively. Such an adjustment goes through profit or loss
Mr.Mike,
Thanks for your prompt advice…
Yes. understood. the fair value is the present value here.
what about the loan note, If there is a loan notes issue, as a part of the consideration, then also, we need to calculate the present value of them, applying the same practice.
Pls advice.
Thanks in advance
BR,
Priyantha
We DO include the present value of the loan note issued as part of the consideration by the application of dcf principles
But this is different than contingent consideration that needs adjustment when the contingency crystallises
As we unroll the discount for the loan note we are going to arrive back at the full value of the loan repayable – we know this because it was us in charge of the discounting
In the contingency situation, the outcome of the uncertain matter is entirely out of our hands
Ok?
Mr.Mike,
Crystal clear You advice…..Thank you very much…..
BR,
Priyantha
you’re welcome
