• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

non Recourse factoring with continue involvement

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › non Recourse factoring with continue involvement

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 years ago by Avatarmisbahkiran.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 12, 2020 at 10:20 pm #580320
    Avatarmisbahkiran
    Participant

    Hi Sir
    need little clarification on this

    if 80 percent of trade receivable of 40 million $ is sold to factoring company with non recourse option. but company guarantees that it will pay a factor 9 percent of each receivable not recovered.company believe that customer represents low credit risk so probability of default is low. lets say fair value of the guarantee is 50,000$

    should we derecognise financial assest?

    Guarantee will be recognized as liability but what about continue involvement in the collection which represents 9 percent. should we need to recognize financial assest of that continue involvement as per IFRS 9 for the amount lower of carrying vale of Financial assest or fair value of amount guarantee to be paid which is 9 percent?

    will it be like

    Dr cash 32
    Dr profit and loss 4.9

    Dr financial assest – continue involvement 3.6(9 percent of 40 amount to be paid to factor which is not certain in this case as its just a percentage of unrecoverable amount)

    Cr financial assest 40
    Cr financial liability 0.5

    or there is no need to recognize the financial assest as probability of default is low and we assume that risk and reward and control both are transferred? and we will recognize loss of 8 million?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate

Donate now

You can also “donate your time” and help out other students on the Students Forums

BPP

Spread the word

Please spread the word so more students can benefit from our study materials.

Donate

If you have found OpenTuition useful, please donate



Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in