• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

ACCA December 2022 Exam results:
* Pass rates * Comments * Instant Poll * Competition *

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

non Recourse factoring with continue involvement

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › non Recourse factoring with continue involvement

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 years ago by misbahkiran.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 12, 2020 at 10:20 pm #580320
    misbahkiran
    Member
    • Topics: 109
    • Replies: 194
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi Sir
    need little clarification on this

    if 80 percent of trade receivable of 40 million $ is sold to factoring company with non recourse option. but company guarantees that it will pay a factor 9 percent of each receivable not recovered.company believe that customer represents low credit risk so probability of default is low. lets say fair value of the guarantee is 50,000$

    should we derecognise financial assest?

    Guarantee will be recognized as liability but what about continue involvement in the collection which represents 9 percent. should we need to recognize financial assest of that continue involvement as per IFRS 9 for the amount lower of carrying vale of Financial assest or fair value of amount guarantee to be paid which is 9 percent?

    will it be like

    Dr cash 32
    Dr profit and loss 4.9

    Dr financial assest – continue involvement 3.6(9 percent of 40 amount to be paid to factor which is not certain in this case as its just a percentage of unrecoverable amount)

    Cr financial assest 40
    Cr financial liability 0.5

    or there is no need to recognize the financial assest as probability of default is low and we assume that risk and reward and control both are transferred? and we will recognize loss of 8 million?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • AkilaShaikh on Capital asset pricing model (part b) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • AkilaShaikh on Capital asset pricing model (part b) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • hamza5168180 on Revenue – allocation – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • John Moffat on Capital asset pricing model (part b) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy