- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 months ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
PQ Awards Nominations
Please help us to win one of the PQ Magazine awards and send in the voting form >>
You can nominate us in any or all of the following categories: Online College of the Year, Study Resource of the Year, Private Sector Lecturer of the Year, and Accountancy Personality of the Year.
Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › MMC (JUN 11)
Why they have not included 12 million for Pe , will it be wrong if we do include it?
Why NPV calculation was done if it was not required in question?
1. I don’t know where you are getting 12million from. They are going to develop the game and the option is as to whether they will then actually continue and produce and market the game. So they will spend 7million a year for the next 2 years whatever happens. The option is as to whether to then spend 35 million in 2 years time or not. So Pe is 35 million.
2. The question asks for the impact of delaying the production and marketing. They do not have to delay and they do not need to have the option, so we need to calculate the impact (benefit) of having the option as compared with not having it.