• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

M&M theory

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › M&M theory

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 10, 2018 at 2:07 pm #472519
    toushiga
    Participant
    • Topics: 424
    • Replies: 172
    • ☆☆☆☆

    capital-structure irrelevance-its does not matter what capital structure a company uses to finance its operations the value of the company does not change

    The higher the cheaper debt, the higher the cost of equity, which will be offset each other

    But how about the higher the equity finance? as the higher the equity finance should lower the gearing level, which should lower the cost of equity? why not raise more equity finance compare to debt finance?is it because it will increase the issue costs?

    Have watched the video lecture but still have this question in mind,hope tutor can explain it to me,thank you so much.

    September 11, 2018 at 8:41 am #472584
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 56
    • Replies: 51888
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Firstly, your first sentence is correct but only if there is no tax (and that the assumptions made by M&M were all to be true).

    Issue costs are irrelevant to the theory – M&M assume no issue costs.

    More equity means lower cost of equity. But since there is more equity (which will still cost more than the cost of debt) then the two effects ‘cancel out’.

    Look again at example 2 in the chapter – even if they are 100% equity financed, then the WACC is still the same as it is when there is gearing.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • MikeLittle on Termination of Offer – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • zan13898 on Termination of Offer – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • Bukr on Life cycle costing (part 2) – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on Inventory Control (part 2) Quantity Discounts – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • zuhairabbas on ACCA AB Chapter 4 – Organisational culture – Questions

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy