• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

MJ23 Q3 Blackbosca Co royalty payment

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › MJ23 Q3 Blackbosca Co royalty payment

  • This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 27, 2024 at 1:13 pm #699189
    phuongmore
    Participant
    • Topics: 131
    • Replies: 128
    • ☆☆☆

    In MJ23 Q3 on Blackbosca Co, the question said that:

    “Blackbosca Co will receive a royalty payment from the investment in Üskistan, payable annually. The first year’s royalty payment is fixed at $2·5m but this will increase annually at a rate of 5% in subsequent years.”

    To calculate cash flow, the answer is as bellow:

    Royalty is included as positive figure in TL. I understand this point.

    But Royalty also is included as negative figure in cash flow in $.I do not understand this point.

    Please explain.

    Thank you.

    January 27, 2024 at 5:27 pm #699204
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Uskistan is paying the royalty to Blackbosca. So it is an outflow in Uskistan’s cash flows, and an inflow in Blackbosca’s cash flows.

    January 28, 2024 at 3:10 am #699209
    phuongmore
    Participant
    • Topics: 131
    • Replies: 128
    • ☆☆☆

    Thank you. I understand.

    In question Q2a, regarding to discussion on NED’s view on the acquisition of Ludham Co, can I get mark if saying that:

    Non-executive director’s views that the acquisition does not reduce risk and will be of no value to Oxwick Co. seems reasonable since Oxwick Co is a listed, shareholder’s porfilio has been well diversify away.

    January 28, 2024 at 8:01 am #699216
    phuongmore
    Participant
    • Topics: 131
    • Replies: 128
    • ☆☆☆

    In Q3b, regarding to Oxwick Co’s acquisition of Ludham Co, the question said that:

    “After four years, the annual growth rate of free cash flows is expected to be 5% for the foreseeable future”

    the answer is :

    Post tax cash flow of year 4: 355.9
    FCF of year 4 : 337.3

    To calculate cash flow year 5 onwards, the examiner uses 355.9 instead of 337.3.

    Please explain why.

    January 28, 2024 at 8:46 am #699221
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    QQ2a – yes, you probably would 🙂

    January 28, 2024 at 8:52 am #699222
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Q3b – it is because the question says that there will be no additional investment from year 5 onwards.

    February 14, 2024 at 8:38 am #700282
    phuongmore
    Participant
    • Topics: 131
    • Replies: 128
    • ☆☆☆

    In MJ23, Q3b: the question says that there will be no additional investment from year 5 onwards.

    Post tax cash flow of year 4: 355.9
    FCF of year 4 : 337.3

    To calculate cash flow year 5 onwards, the examiner uses 355.9 instead of 337.3.

    In MJ22, Q3ai: the question is silent on saying that whether there will be no additional investment from year 5 onwards.

    Post tax cash flow of year 4: 388
    FCF of year 4 : 282

    To calculate cash flow year 5 onwards, the examiner uses 282 instead of 388

    Can I use this rule to apply in the exam :

    Whenever the question says that ” there will be no additional investment from year 5(for example) onwards”, I will use post tax CF of Y4 to calculate cash flow year 5 onwards.

    If the question is silent on this, I will use FCF of Y4 instead of.

    Thank you.

    February 14, 2024 at 9:05 am #700297
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – you can use that ‘rule’ 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in