Forums › ACCA Forums › General ACCA Forums › Mitigating Circumstances
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by Kim Smith.
- AuthorPosts
- December 21, 2020 at 6:05 pm #600495
Long post, apologies in advance! To make it easier, I’ve summarised my question at the beginning.
I was hoping that you might be able to help with something please? In your experience, if the ACCA were to accept the mitigating circumstances below, how would that impact my results? Presumably they can’t just award extra marks if they aren’t there? I’d be super grateful for your insight. If I had to guess, I estimate my result to be in the 45% region.
I have learning difficulties, and accordingly, I am awarded extra time during my exams. I am awarded an additional 15 minutes per hour, and therefore for the four-hour strategic business reporting exam, this would amount to an additional hour. This additional time was not granted to me, and I was not made aware of this until I booked the exam. In fact, I did not know that this was the case until the exam started. I did raise this with the invigilator, but there was nothing they could do.
The key impact that this had on my exam is that it ruined my exam strategy and exam technique. I have read various examiners commentary’s in past papers, and one of the comments that frequently comes up is that “students perform better if they attempt all questions”. In order to attempt all the questions I had to effectively partially answer questions – if a question asked for the position at 2 different dates for example I found that I simply had to take a view to only answer at one point in time, because, with my learning difficulties I simply couldn’t have covered all the questions.
I was so happy when I saw that part of question one related to cash flow statements. I spent a significant amount of time practising those, and they were one of my preferred topics. However, because I was keen to “attempt all questions”, I decided to keep going with the exam and come back once I had attempted the other parts of the exam. By the time I came back to that at the beginning I had literally forgotten half the information in the scenario – and so it was a fruitless exercise. I appreciate with hindsight that this was perhaps not the best approach, however I was not made aware that I had effectively lost an hour until the exam started. There is no way I would have taken the exam without the additional time – however if I had decided to, I would have worked out an approach in advance.
Another impact was that I simply didn’t have time to read all of the scenarios relating to questions. I am a slow reader, and simply have to read things at least twice – it takes me longer to read and so I have to read them again as by the time I’ve got to the end I have often forgotten what the start of the information said. I just didn’t have time to do this in the exam, and I am well aware that I would have missed relatively straight forward marks because of this.
I completely appreciate that the ACCA are doing everything they can during these strange times to keep exams going, and I am grateful for their effort. I also appreciate that a fundamental change such as running remote exams is unlikely to proceed perfectly, and that mistakes will be made. That said, I obviously don’t want any mistake to be to my detriment.
I have never failed an ACCA exam, and have scored in excess if 70% in three of the exams.December 22, 2020 at 7:27 am #600516Today (midnight UK time) is the DEADLINE for mitigating circumstances – you must apply without delay. See here https://www.accaglobal.com/in/en/help/exam-sessions.html
“It is extremely important for you to provide any documentary evidence relating to your personal circumstances (where applicable), for consideration to be given. You may upload this with your Mitigating Circumstance submission via MyACCA.”Be brief and to the point – provide/reference the confirmation of extra time – state that at the commencement of the exam you were told you would not have the extra time – that this was stressful and although you did your best to allocate your time to answer all parts of all questions the time was insufficient for you to demonstrate your capabilities.
You should not need to explain the background etc as ACCA should obviously have record of that – nor do you need to refer to your past exam record – if relevant, ACCA will have access to that. Submit your claim IMMEDIATELY.
As you say, ACCA will not make up marks that aren’t there – but they will look at the “quality” of the marks earned. Believe me when I say that to partially answer answer all the questions was a better strategy than not answering some questions. (Hypothetically – suppose a student got 49 marks – all on Q1 – there is no way they should pass because they should, of course, have attempted section B Qs also and it should be expected that they would get more marks for a question that they have devoted too much time to.)
When you’ve submitted your claim there’s no point worrying. If you think you got 45% on a paper that most students thought was a disaster you could well have got 50% anyway.
Do write back to use with your result.
December 22, 2020 at 6:25 pm #600588Thanks ever so much for your super helpful reply – it is very much appreciated. All submitted and I will circle back to you once I have the results.
Thank you again!
December 23, 2020 at 7:14 am #600624Excellent! Fingers crossed for you! If you save the url of this post I will keep this post open and you let me know how you got on here https://opentuition.com/topic/mitigating-circumstances-3
January 18, 2021 at 11:44 am #606789Dear Kim!
Thank you ever so much for taking the time to reply to my query and offer your invaluable advice.
I am delighted – I got 78% in the exam. They haven’t how or whether they adjusted the result for the mitigating circumstances, but I would suspect that perhaps they allocated all the professional marks!Thanks ever so much for all your support and for all the incredible work that you and your team do.
Very best wishes for 2021
Natalie
January 18, 2021 at 11:57 am #606811That’s wonderful news Natalie! Thank you for letting me know. I felt sure that with you previous record of 70%+ that you would have passed as long as you had “kept your cool” – which I think you did 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.