• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Miller & Modigliani

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Miller & Modigliani

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 12, 2011 at 2:12 pm #48343
    sophia moore
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Hi
    Probaly a silly question, But hoping you can explain the Miller & Modigliani theory and assumptions, I just cannot seem to get this around my head : (
    Thanks

    May 21, 2011 at 12:40 pm #81526
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If a company raised more debt finance, the the fact that the cost of debt is lower than the cost of equity is going to reduce the WACC. However because there is then higher gearing and therefore more risk to shareholders, the cost of equity is going to increase, which will increase the WACC.
    So….the WACC is likely to change.
    M&M proved that if there is no tax, then the lower cost of debt and the higher cost of equity balance off, and the WACC stays constant – in which case it does not matter how a company raises finance because the overall cost stays the same.
    However, if there is tax, then the cost of debt gets cheaper still (because interest is tax allowable) and this means that the WACC will fall when more debt is raised. So…..a company should raise as much debt as possible because the WACC will fall.
    There are many assumptions in their proof. The important ones are:
    They assume debt is irredeemable
    They assume a perfect market (no transaction costs etc)
    They assume perfect knowledge (that shareholders have perfect knowledge about what the company is planning)
    They ignore the possibility of the company going bankrupt (which would make things more risky for everyone)

    May 23, 2011 at 9:02 am #81527
    sophia moore
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Thanku John now I feel a lot more comfortable with WACC : ))

    May 29, 2011 at 4:04 pm #81528
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nicholas1239798 on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in