- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks ago by P2-D2.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
ACCA Webinars: How to earn marks in Strategic Professional Exams. Learn more >>
20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams - Get BPP Discount Code >>
when remove Swanson (subsidiary), why the COS of Pirkin on P’s individual statement does not add back $1m?
In normal consolidation, we have:
COS (G) = COS (P) + COS (S) – Intra sale + URP
=> COS (P) should be = COS (G) – COS (S) + Intra sale – URP
Where do I put it wrong?
Has this question not been answered in the revision videos?