- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks ago by
P2-D2.
P2-D2.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
camtuvu
- Topics: 12
- Replies: 12
- ☆
when remove Swanson (subsidiary), why the COS of Pirkin on P’s individual statement does not add back $1m?
In normal consolidation, we have:
COS (G) = COS (P) + COS (S) – Intra sale + URP=> COS (P) should be = COS (G) – COS (S) + Intra sale – URP
Where do I put it wrong?
P2-D2
- Topics: 4
- Replies: 6158
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Hi,
Has this question not been answered in the revision videos?
Thanks
camtuvu
P2-D2Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.