- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Congratulations to Jamil from Pakistan and Jeeva from Malaysia - Global Prize winners!
see all ACCA December 2022 Genius Hunt Competition winners >>
Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>
Sir, please help me to understand the reason for the following answer. It is supposed to be right: More attention to R&D costs in year 20XX could reduce warranty costs in subsequent years.
Why is it necessary for more R&D to reduce warranty costs? In my understanding, R&D might reduce but might also NOT to reduce warranty costs in future…
or we should just think in a way that if it is possible that it COULD reduce then the statement is right.
I am just worring about how the quiestion is arranged.
Writing that is ‘could’ reduce warranty costs is not saying that it definitely will!
‘Could’ means the same as ‘might’ 🙂