20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

KIT QUESTION

This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author
Posts
November 29, 2017 at 3:53 pm #418914
humai
Participant
- Topics: 757
- Replies: 248
Sir in Page One Records v Britton (Trading as The Troggs) (1967) as manager (claimant) cannot get an injunction
against Troggs (defendant) because troggs cannot get an order of specific performance from manager. Like wise,
why in Warner Brothers Pictures Inc v Nelson (1936), claimant can get an injunction against film star bette, when bette
cannot get order of specific performance against claimant?
November 29, 2017 at 5:49 pm #418942
MikeLittle
Keymaster
- Topics: 27
- Replies: 23359
Life’s a mystery isn’t it!
You can’t get an injunction that insists that you have to employ someone or not carry on in business
The Warner Bros case merely stopped Bette Davis from working for a different film company. It didn’t stop her working
OK?
Author
Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘KIT QUESTION’ is closed to new replies.