- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘KIT QUESTION’ is closed to new replies.
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › KIT QUESTION
Sir in Page One Records v Britton (Trading as The Troggs) (1967) as manager (claimant) cannot get an injunction
against Troggs (defendant) because troggs cannot get an order of specific performance from manager. Like wise,
why in Warner Brothers Pictures Inc v Nelson (1936), claimant can get an injunction against film star bette, when bette
cannot get order of specific performance against claimant?
Life’s a mystery isn’t it!
You can’t get an injunction that insists that you have to employ someone or not carry on in business
The Warner Bros case merely stopped Bette Davis from working for a different film company. It didn’t stop her working
OK?
