- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 months ago by
John Moffat.
John Moffat.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
Kira0896
- Topics: 5
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Good evening, Sir
When the question states ”Recent mergers have attracted an acquisition
premium of around 25%–30%”, the answer revealed the premium is 30% instead of 25% in share for share offer.May I know why is 30% premium chosen? Is it because Danton Co’s directors indicated their shareholders would be expecting a premium towards the higher end of this scale for a share-for-share offer?
Kindly explain it so that I can understand well.
I would appreciate if Sir is willing to allocate your time on answering this question.
Thanks and stay safe.
John Moffat
- Topics: 57
- Replies: 49628
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Yes – the reason you give is the reason (that the shareholders would be expecting a premium towards to higher end of the scale).
Kira0896
John MoffatViewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.