• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

Kaplan MTQ

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Kaplan MTQ

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 23, 2018 at 2:16 pm #479564
    maxpopper
    Member
    • Topics: 177
    • Replies: 132
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir there is a question that

    Scrap value of machine 2 is 120000.
    It is felt that final scrap value of machine depends on two factors: whether or not a new supplier enters the market (which would reduce likely scrap value) & strength of dollar against other currencies (since sales of used machines will be made abroad & invoiced in foreign currency). Adverse effects will each reduce scrap value by 10% of fig used in investment appraisal. Relevant probabilities are

    New supplier Prob Strong $ Prob

    Yes 0.4 yes 0.3
    No 0.6 no 0.7

    What is EV of scrap proceeds from machine 2

    In solution they have done as follows

    Scrap value Prob EV
    120000 0.6×0.7 = 0.42 50400
    108000 0.4×0.7+0.6×0.3=0.46 49680
    96000 0.4×0.3=0.12 11520

    Can you please explain me the above solution

    October 23, 2018 at 4:42 pm #479583
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 56
    • Replies: 51950
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If neither of the adverse effects happen, then the scrap will be 120,000.

    If just one of the adverse effects happen then the scrap will be 90% x 120,000 = 108,000

    If both of the adverse effects happen, then the scrap will be 120,000 x 80% = 96,000

    The probability of no new supplier is 0.6, and the probability of there being no problem with the exchange rate if 0.7.

    Therefore the expected value of no adverse effects is 120,000 x 0.6 x 0.7.

    For there to be just one adverse effect (and the other effect to be OK):
    For adverse new supplier but not adverse exchange rate is 0.4 x 0.7
    For not adverse new supplier but adverse exchange rate is 0.6 x 0.3

    Therefore the probability of just one adverse effect is (0.4 x 0.7) + (0.6 x 0.3)

    For two adverse effects, then probability is 0.4 x 0.3

    For Kaplan to include this example is a bit silly of them. OK, it is basic probabilities, but FM is not a probability exam. The chances of something like this being asked in the exam are virtually zero, and even if it was asked there is no way that it could be as much as 50% of a question C and there would be enough elsewhere in the question to still be able to pass it.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

Changes to the SBL exam from September 2023

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

 

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • John Moffat on CAPM and MM Combined – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Rana Nabeel on CAPM and MM Combined – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Sensitivity Analysis (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • DIVIJ on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Sensitivity Analysis (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Interpretation of Financial Statements part a – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy