• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

june 2011 question 9

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › june 2011 question 9

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 18, 2013 at 5:47 pm #146639
    bik123
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 81
    • ☆☆

    hi,
    i have question why Hope do not bound company into contract because of implied authority?

    In hely-hutchinson case director also act as de facto director (similary as Hope) and bound company becasue has implied authority as CEO despite fact that not expressly appointed. SO why is teh difference in decision : exam: company bound becasue of apparent authority, but in hely hutchinson case implied authority.

    thanks in advance for reply

    November 19, 2013 at 11:12 am #146738
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I’m not sure that I could distinguish between “apparent” and “implied” nor even “ostensible”

    November 19, 2013 at 2:16 pm #146765
    bik123
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 81
    • ☆☆

    i know that apparent and ostensible authority it is the same thing… but implied authority has other definiiton so i don’t understand you…

    November 20, 2013 at 3:30 pm #146990
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Try this:-

    It is true that actual authority and apparent authority are quite independent of one another. An actual authority is a legal relationship between the principal and agent created by an agreement to which they alone are parties. It may be express, when it is given by express words like passing of resolution by the board of directors authorizing a director to employ architects. It is implied when it is concluded from the conduct of the parties or the circumstances of the case, such as when the board of directors appoint one of them as managing director. On the other side, apparent authority is the authority which an agent appears to others to have as a result of some representation or conduct by the principal intended to be acted upon the third party. (Shum, 1989)

    From the above passage, it is clear that actual authority depends upon the agreement between the principal and the agent, whereas apparent authority depends upon the representation made by the principal to the third party. Hence, both types of authority are not dependant on each other.

    The above statement is more precisely construed by Lord Denning in his decision of Hely-Hutchinson case. He finds this case quite similar to Freeman and Lockyer case. In that case, the chairman was held to have implied actual authority whereas, in latter case, Mr Kapoor was held to have apparent authority. Lord Denning MR held in the Hely-Hutchinson case that, “Ostensible or apparent authority is the authority of an agent as it appears to others. It often coincides with actual authority”. He identified it in Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd that, the chairman acting as an appointed managing director by the board had apparent authority as well as implied actual authority. This case demonstrated that the two types of authority often overlap thus creating confusion between the scope of actual authority and apparent authority. (Maclntyre, 2008)

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • RashidMh on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kennedyavege@2023 on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in