• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Is this a hybrid instrument that should be separated?

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Is this a hybrid instrument that should be separated?

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 10, 2018 at 8:38 pm #446045
    professormoriarty
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    If you have a so called “off-market derivative” – that is a derivative, for example an interest rate swap that has a negative value. I’ve been told these should be separated in two – into a loan component and a derivative that is “at-the-money” (value is equal to nil).

    Does this solution stem from IFRS 9 4.3.3? These derivatives are seen as a hybrid contract – that shall be separated? Please help me understand this…

    Thanks

    April 10, 2018 at 10:20 pm #446057
    professormoriarty
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Just to be clear, I mean a derivative that is off-market (has negative value) at inception

    April 11, 2018 at 9:10 pm #446239
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7228
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    I’m no expert on interest rate swaps with negative values (what does that even mean?) and not fully acquainted with “off-market derivatives” so I doubt I’d be able to answer this one.

    Sorry

    April 11, 2018 at 11:30 pm #446253
    professormoriarty
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi again!

    It just means that the terms of the swap are different to market terms, so that for one of the parties it has a positive value and for the other a negative value. This is balanced in some way, for example through a lump sum payment between the parties at inception, so in essence it’s a swap with a financing component

    April 15, 2018 at 5:11 pm #446726
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7228
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I’d speak to the person who has told you that it should be separated as they’ll be able to explain. They sound to be much more knowledgeable than I am.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • LiliaDvornikova on Statement of cash flows – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • BurtBikkie on Professional Ethics – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Lameesmazrooe on ACCA BT Chapter 4 – Organisational culture – Questions
  • John Moffat on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Abdinur on FA Chapter 22 Questions Group Accounts The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (1)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in