Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Investment in associate(dividend payment)
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- December 2, 2014 at 2:43 pm #216042
Hello,
Example 1
On 1 January 20X3 Paradigm acquired 35% of the equity shares in Rainbow for $3m. Rainbow had retained earnings of $7.5m at March 20X2 and $13.5m at March 20X3. Its profits accrue evenly over the year. Rainbow paid a dividend of $2m on 1 March 20X3. Paradigm credited its dividend received to profit or loss.What amount will be shown as “investment in associate” in the consolidated SOFP for paradigm as at 31 March 20X3?
The answer is
Cost of inv 3m + 0.35m*=3.35m*Earning for the year 6m(13.5m-7.5m) less 2m(dividend paid)= 4m X 3/12 X 35%=0.35
My first question is if retained earning as at 31 March 20X3 are 13.5m should not it already include the deducted dividend. For example if at the beginning retained earning are $7.5m profit for the year is $8m and $2m of dividends is paid year end retained earnings should be $13.5m(7.5+8-2))
Also according to another Question (Example 2) on 1 February 20X1 Picardy acquired 35% of the equity shares of Avignon, its only associate, for $10m in cash. The post-tax profit of Avignon for the year to 30 September 20X1 was $3m. Profits accrued evenly throughout the year. Avignon made a dividend payment of $1m on 1 September 20X1.
What amount will be shown as “investment in associate” in the SOFP of Picardy as at 30 September 20X1?
The answer is
Cost of inv 10m + 0.35m*=10.35m*($3m X 8/12)-1m))*35%=0.35m
So my second question is that in first example first dividend was deducted and than the post acquisition profit was calculated and in example 2 first post acquisition profit was calculated and than dividends deducted.
Please help which one is correct or what I am getting wrong
December 2, 2014 at 3:16 pm #216061Hi
The problem here is “from what year have you drawn these questions?”
Relatively recently the “rule” was changed from the assumption that a dividend could be broken down into that part that had come from pre-acquisition profits and that part that was financed out of post-acquisition profits.
The change in the rule decided that this was silly so now we time apportion the retained profit for the year.
This sounds like Picardy was from the pre-rule-change period and Paradigm from the post-rule-change period
Hope that helps
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.