- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- Posts
why the impairment is accounted for differently in June 2013 Ques 1 note:3 and Dec 2012 Ques 1 note:3 H
Hi,
It is due to the specific information given in each of the questions. In Dec 2012 it states that the recoverable amount has been determined without consideration of the liabilities. When we therefore use the carrying value of the subsidiary we should also not include the liabilities to make to comparable like for like.
Int he June 2013 question we were given the recoverable value of the net assets, so will compare to the carrying value of the subsidiary net assets.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.