Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IFRS 2
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by P2-D2.
- AuthorPosts
- September 3, 2019 at 8:14 pm #544598
Hello sir can you please guide me through this confusion
Suppose fair value on grant date of share options was 8 CU. Entity granted 100 options to each of its 3 directors. Vesting period was of 2 years. In middle of next year, entity decides to cancel this scheme. But at the cancellation date the FV of original instruments was 9 CU and the entity settles the scheme by paying employees 10 CU for each option.
Now the first entry on cancellation would be to recognise the expense of original FV. i.e 8 CU in SOPL. Now the balance in equity reserves is 100*8*3 = 2400
But when the final settlement entry is made we do
DR. Equity 2700 (100*9*3)
DR. SOPL 300 (100*1*3)
CR. CASH 3000 (10*100*3)
My ques is .. How can we debit equity reserves by 2700 when the existing balance we have is only of 2400 (3*100*8) expensed in the vesting period ?
Where do we get the excess 300 (2700-2400) to debit from equity ?September 8, 2019 at 9:41 pm #545592Hi,
Here are the rules from IFRS 2
“The cancellation or settlement of equity instruments is accounted for as an acceleration of the vesting period and therefore any amount unrecognised that would otherwise have been charged should be recognised immediately. Any payments made with the cancellation or settlement (up to the fair value of the equity instruments) should be accounted for as the repurchase of an equity interest. Any payment in excess of the fair value of the equity instruments granted is recognised as an expense”
So, you would remove the 2,400 and the rest is treated as an expense, I think this would make it a 600 expense.
Thanks
September 9, 2019 at 11:12 am #545642But sir in the kaplan book the entry on the date of cancellation of scheme is
Dr. Equit 2700
Dr. SOPL 300
CR. Cash 3000
They have debited equity with the fair value at the date of cancellation (9) and not with the fair value at the grant date (8)
Therefore i’m getting confused for the excess amout of equity debited (300) because the original debit is only of 2400.
ThanksSeptember 10, 2019 at 8:16 pm #545804It looks like their answer is incorrect then unless I’m mistaken.
Thanks
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.