• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IFRS 13

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IFRS 13

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Stephen Widberg.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 27, 2021 at 9:20 am #615304
    Noah098
    Member
    • Topics: 935
    • Replies: 352
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    sir we are supposed to use IFRS13 to answer this question.

    “In addition, Mehran has acquired the brand name associated with the produce from the farm. Mehran has decided to discontinue the brand on the assumption that it is similar to its existing brands. Mehran has determined that if it ceases to use the brand, then the indirect benefits will be $20 million. If it continues to use the brand, then the direct benefit will be $17 million. Other companies in this market do not have brands that are as strong as Mehran’s and so would not see any significant benefit from the discontinuation.”

    now sir the highest and best use fo a non-financial asset is the use that market participants would alopt to maximise($20m, though discontinuation) its value . So if a market participant were to acquire Mehran it would discontinue the brand to maximise its value to the firm.

    But the answer at the back is FV should be 17$m because other companies who don’t have strong brands would use it instead of disposing it.

    March 28, 2021 at 11:56 am #615361
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 3411
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    A very confusing question – not your fault!

    In my simple mind the brand has a FV of 17.

    Why continue to use 17, stop using 0. Greater is 17.

    I cannot imagine valuing something at ‘indirect benefits’, so that’s my final word on this one.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • verweijlisa on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)
  • Salexy on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in