• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Congratulations to Jamil from Pakistan and Jeeva from Malaysia - Global Prize winners!
see all ACCA December 2022 Genius Hunt Competition winners >>

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

IAS 24

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 24

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 months ago by Stephen Widberg.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 30, 2022 at 9:41 am #652307
    thanh123
    Member
    • Topics: 44
    • Replies: 30
    • ☆☆

    Hello, I have a question in part b of question 29 Egin group in BPP kit.

    (1): Doye has 40% of Spade -> This relationship is associate -> NOT disclose the intra-group transactions between both of them. But the answer has written that the disclosure of the transaction. I think that it is not correct.

    (2) Egin has 60% of Doye and Doye has 40% of Spade. I am confused that the answer: Egin and Spade is NOT related party ? and the reason for this is not clear. Furthermore, this question is the same case of Atomic & Eye. The answer for NOT related party is not clear.

    (3) I assume that Doye has 60% of Spade rather than 40% of Spade, if Egin and Spade is the related party ? I think that it is the related party but I am NOT sure about this.

    Hope to see your explanations. Thanks tutor !

    March 31, 2022 at 7:36 am #652373
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 2843
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    (one question per post please)

    In RPT questions it is fine to say that X and Y MAY be RP – it is a matter of professional judgement.

    Remember that at this level we worry more about the substance of the relationship than any specific % – i.e. does control or influence exist in substance.

    Under IAS you MUST disclose transactions with subs and ass – so disclosure would be required in the first scenario above.

    All the examiner wants to see is that you know the definitions and can attempt to appy them.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • Iby2012 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Iby2012 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Iby2012 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • baraka42 on PM Chapter 13 Questions Standard Costing and Basic Variance Analysis
  • baraka42 on PM Chapter 13 Questions Standard Costing and Basic Variance Analysis

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy