• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Highwood – Factoring receivable

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Highwood – Factoring receivable

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by Avataraarina.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 26, 2018 at 10:18 pm #464669
    Avataraarina
    Member

    Hi,

    Highwood factored/sold receivable book value $10m to Easyfinance and receive payment $8.7m, will pay 2% per month on any uncollected balance. Highwood derecognized receivables and charge $1.3 in admin expense. If not factored allowance $0.6m made against receivable.

    I had a look at the answer, they took the receivable value in the trial balance of $47100 and + the $10m – $0.6m.

    Q1: what the question wants us to actually solve. If i hadnt look at the answer i wouldnt get what it wants.
    Q2: It says company derecognize, but why the $10 is added instead of deducted from the total amount of receivable in the trial balance?
    Q3: I understand that provision/allowance for receivable reduces the receivable value as such it is deducted. But why is the question speculating if it was not factored when it is already factored?
    Q4: What is the treatment for the “pay 2% on uncollected balance”? What uncollected balance? of the $10m?
    Q5: Why do they need to charged $1.3m to admin expense? instead of deducting from receivable? Where do the $1.3m go to now.

    Thanks Chris.

    July 26, 2018 at 11:56 pm #464825
    AvatarP2-D2
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Factoring is always a tricky one, but in answer to your questions:

    Q1: It wants you to get the correct accounting treatment in the financial statements, so I’m presuming this is from a published company accounts question.

    Q2: They’ve incorretly derecognised the receivable, and should continue to recognise it on the SFP.

    Q3: As the receivable should be on the face of the SFP, the allowance is required.

    Q4: This is effectively the interest on the $8.7m cash advance.

    Q5: The charge to administrative expense is the incorrect treatment. When they’ve derecognised he receivable they have DR Bank $8.7m DR Exenses (balancing figure) $1.3m CR Receivable $10m, and so if we are recognising the receivable then we need to remove the expense too.

    The correct treatment initially should have been to DR Bank $8.7m CR Loan $8.7m

    Thanks

    July 27, 2018 at 2:32 am #464828
    Avataraarina
    Member

    Thanks understood!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Highwood – Factoring receivable’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate

Donate now

You can also “donate your time” and help out other students on the Students Forums

BPP

Spread the word

Please spread the word so more students can benefit from our study materials.

Donate

If you have found OpenTuition useful, please donate



Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in