Skip to content

ACCA Forums

PMhelp with "relevant cost of an asset" please

Nneilsolaris16y ago
I'm struggling to understand the concept of working out the relevant cost of an asset. My BPP book simply shows a "higher of, lower of" diagram, without explaining how it works. I'll give the question I'm stuck on.

A machine cost $14,000 ten years ago. It is expected that the machine will generate future revenues of $10,000. Alternatively, the machine could be scrapped for $8,000. An equivalent machine in the same condition would cost $9,000 to buy now. What is the deprival value of the machine?

I understand that the $14,000 is a sunk cost, and is irrelevant. Therefore, if the machine was kept, would the cost be - $10,000 + $8,000 = - $2000? However, in that case, would it not be possible to still sell it as scrap afterwards?

The alternative would be to buy a new one. In that case, am I right in saying the cost would be $9,000 - $8,000 = $1,000?

The answer given in my book says "the deprival value of the machine is the lower of the replacement cost and £10,000. The deprival value is therefore $9,000. I'm afraid I can't draw the diagram here, but it is on page 351 of the BPP book if you have it.

I would be very grateful if someone could explain how this works please, and also how the diagram works.

Thanks a lot.
Nneilsolaris16y ago#1
I meant to post this in the F2 forum, but feel free to reply if you can help me!
Sign into reply to this topic.