• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Hav co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Hav co

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 3, 2019 at 10:47 am #544454
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 51
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    Sir do you think it is acceptable to value Strand co using their own method?
    Captial employed+intangible value.

    And share price of strand co base on this value.

    Because they want to use their method to value their comany.

    September 3, 2019 at 2:26 pm #544495
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54735
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No, because the question specifically asks for you to do it on the based on the two different opinions.

    Strand is of the opinion that most of its value is in intangible assets but it goes on to say that therefore the premium should based on the PV to infinity of the after tax excess………

    September 4, 2019 at 12:18 am #544629
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 51
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    For last part of qurstion, It was asking whether it is acceptable for strand co. They wouldnt know what PE is for their company because PE value was base on Hav co’s opinion. But PE was used for firm valuation.

    So wouldnt it correct to value strand co using calculated intangible method for firm valuation?

    September 4, 2019 at 1:30 am #544632
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 51
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    What i meant was
    Strand co value is intangible calculated + capital employed = strand co value

    September 4, 2019 at 12:05 pm #544691
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54735
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – that would be OK 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘Hav co’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • stvincent89 on ACCA P4 Question 1 December 2014 part 3
  • jamesker on FM Chapter 15 Questions Test 1 – The valuation of securities – theoretical approach
  • lara01 on Problems with registration
  • stvincent89 on Corporate Reorganisation and Capital Reconstruction Schemes (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Ark9804 on Foreign exchange risk management (2) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in