• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Hav co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Hav co

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 3, 2019 at 10:47 am #544454
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 51
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    Sir do you think it is acceptable to value Strand co using their own method?
    Captial employed+intangible value.

    And share price of strand co base on this value.

    Because they want to use their method to value their comany.

    September 3, 2019 at 2:26 pm #544495
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No, because the question specifically asks for you to do it on the based on the two different opinions.

    Strand is of the opinion that most of its value is in intangible assets but it goes on to say that therefore the premium should based on the PV to infinity of the after tax excess………

    September 4, 2019 at 12:18 am #544629
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 51
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    For last part of qurstion, It was asking whether it is acceptable for strand co. They wouldnt know what PE is for their company because PE value was base on Hav co’s opinion. But PE was used for firm valuation.

    So wouldnt it correct to value strand co using calculated intangible method for firm valuation?

    September 4, 2019 at 1:30 am #544632
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 51
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    What i meant was
    Strand co value is intangible calculated + capital employed = strand co value

    September 4, 2019 at 12:05 pm #544691
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – that would be OK 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘Hav co’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • tomikacharles1986 on Depreciation Introduction – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • CartelAwper on ACCA BT Chapter 3 – An organisation’s stakeholders – Questions
  • Colossus on Presentation of financial statements – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Jay15 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Inflation (example 5) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • oabilentatiwa on Process Technology and Quality control – CIMA E1

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in