• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Hardy Analysis

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Hardy Analysis

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by Avataraarina.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 15, 2018 at 12:46 pm #467975
    Avataraarina
    Member

    Hi Chris,

    I needed help i legit dont understand this note in the kaplan exam kit for the answer to the question

    It says:

    Not appropriate to revise equity upwards (Q1: Are they talking about revising the 2009 figure or what cause the adjustment surplus in 2009 and we’re suppose to adjust and find the underlying figure for 2010, also to be sure we are talking about the FVTPL of the loss in market value of property still right) (Q2: how are you even going to revise it upwards?) for the one-off losses when calculating equity based underlying figure as the losses will be continuing part of equity unless they reverse (Q3: Right, so how is reversal is being done? How is it still continuing? Like whats the reason/circumstances?) even if/when future earnings recover. (Q4: Future earning recover because of market is no longer in recession or when the PFY is not showing a lost? How can the PFY not showing a loss? is it due to the adjust underlying 2010 is making a profit of 2300?

    So basically i wanted to to can you please clarify that note for me again please. Complete unfathomable region. Not sure my brain is saturated or that is it porous enough.

    August 15, 2018 at 1:10 pm #467988
    AvatarP2-D2
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    If the brain is saturated then don’t try and fill it with anything extra, also I’ve not got the Kaplan kit so can’t really help without looking at it.

    Thanks

    August 17, 2018 at 2:36 pm #468218
    AvatarP2-D2
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    So which question is it in the link that you’ve provided?

    Thanks

    August 17, 2018 at 3:13 pm #468233
    Avataraarina
    Member

    Sorry! the question is hardy 🙂

    August 17, 2018 at 3:36 pm #468235
    Avataraarina
    Member

    Regarding another question from the same kit, Hydan,

    Note 1. Hydan buys all inventory at 10% less than market value.

    i thought the current COS would be reduced by 10% so 10% x 45K
    But the answer gives $50K which is 45/0.9

    How am i to know that im suppose to calculate the 100% portion?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate

Donate now

You can also “donate your time” and help out other students on the Students Forums

BPP

Spread the word

Please spread the word so more students can benefit from our study materials.

Donate

If you have found OpenTuition useful, please donate



Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in