• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

generally developed intangibles

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › generally developed intangibles

  • This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 29, 2014 at 10:19 am #206546
    kerri
    Member
    • Topics: 132
    • Replies: 240
    • ☆☆☆

    what is generally developed intangibles, it states on the kaplan book that ” intangibles do not meet the recognition criteria are internally goodwill, brands, publishing titles, customer list, research, adv, start up costs and training. it should be charged to income stat.

    is brands not intangible asset?

    October 30, 2014 at 7:52 am #206702
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes, brands are intangible assets. But if it’s an internally generated (did you really mean “generally developed intangibles”?) brand, then it should be expensed. If it’s a purchased brand, then it’s on the statement of financial position

    October 30, 2014 at 11:09 am #206792
    kerri
    Member
    • Topics: 132
    • Replies: 240
    • ☆☆☆

    So internally developed intangibles are always capitalised? What is internally developed intangible anyway?
    So brands, patents etc are all expensed

    October 31, 2014 at 7:09 am #206922
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    NO, NO, NO!

    Internally generated are NOT capitalised, they are expensed.

    Intangible assets that are BOUGHT are capitalised

    Brands, patents etc are NOT always expensed. If we have BOUGHT them in, say, an acquisition of a subsidiary, then they are capitalised.

    If we develop them ourselves internally, then they are expensed

    October 31, 2014 at 9:04 am #206942
    kerri
    Member
    • Topics: 132
    • Replies: 240
    • ☆☆☆

    thanks very much. so internally generated intangibles can be external and internal. if external then capitalised ( lets say it meets the criteria) and interanlly developed will be capitalised. the question dec 2011 scrambles didnt really say if it was acquired, just says internally, so i assume its expensed, but answers say. ias 38 Internally generated is capitalised if criteria is met.

    October 31, 2014 at 3:00 pm #206996
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    NO!!!! INTERNALLY generated is generated ….. internally. How can an internally generated intangible be externally generated?

    If internally generated, then expense. If bought from outside, then capitalise.

    Very rare exceptions allow some internally generated to be capitalised – for example, development expenditure – but only then if they satisfy the criteria

    October 31, 2014 at 4:59 pm #207014
    kerri
    Member
    • Topics: 132
    • Replies: 240
    • ☆☆☆

    Ok I understand it fully. Thank you Mike 🙂

    November 1, 2014 at 6:52 am #207050
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

    November 18, 2014 at 4:37 pm #211060
    latoyah
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 207
    • ☆☆☆

    hi Mike,

    when i did this question (scramble) i had to go through the answer a few times to get it. if you read that Interanally generates intangibles aren’t capitalised why did they recognise it.

    the past papers have me wondering if i learnt anything at all!!

    November 19, 2014 at 8:37 pm #211431
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Scramble? what reference?

    And PLEASE be careful with your spelling of interanally! It sounds extremely medical!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • o1lim on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Replacement – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in