- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 months ago by
Ken Garrett.
Ken Garrett.-
Posts
-
Noah098
- Topics: 936
- Replies: 352
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Sir when there are these two types of questions->
1. Evaluate the extent to which the strategies help in achieving org goals or similar
2. Assess the adequacy of say, risk mitigating activities and risks identified in the given risk registerIn both cases not only do we have to provide our COMMENT- whether justified or not/(in)adequate etc for EACH POINT(or at least as much as we can cover) given in the exhibit, but also in both questions we have to suggest ADDITIONAL/MISSED OUT POINTS AS WELL? like they could have also done…..
OR missed points we have to suggest in 2. only?
Many thanks for your patience! Just two weeks to go sir, and I won’t bother you ever after this! But of course would be forever grateful to you and OT for providing access to such a beautiful resource 🙂
Ken Garrett
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 9993
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Evaluate looks for a balanced view, so pluses and minuses.
Assess the adequacy……again I would talk about the good things, but assessment implies some shortcomings and you should mention those too.
Noah098
Ken Garrett- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.