- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
Stephen Widberg.
Stephen Widberg.-
Posts
-
Jiya024
- Topics: 168
- Replies: 56
- ☆☆☆
Dear Professor,
Specimen 1: Q1)Kutchen co. part d)
“IAS 32 states that a contingent obligation to pay cash which is outside the control of both parties to a contract meets the definition of a financial liability which shall be initially measured at fair value.”
Professor i found this line in my exam kit. I think it has a flaw! i think it should not say financial liability.
Isnt it exact definition of a contingent liability? which reads something like this i believe: “Present obligation as a result of a past event whose occurrence or non-occurrence will depend on future events beyond the control of the entity”
Stephen Widberg
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 2529
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Discussion question, so they are testing knowledge of definitions. There may be no right answer.
But I would say that, as the transaction is in connection with the purchase of a business, I think consideration should be RECOGNISED not DISCLOSED.
As contingent liabilities are never recognised, I guess that makes it a financial liability.
🙂
Jiya024
Stephen Widberg- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.