• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Figure This Fraud out!!!

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AAA Advanced Audit and Assurance Forums › Figure This Fraud out!!!

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by wrathofheaven1.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 7, 2010 at 6:30 am #45483
    wrathofheaven1
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    We are challenged by our teacher to figure and explain out what this accountant is doing and how is he conducting this fraud. Please use double entries too easily explain the fraud. Its Question 25 from BPP and here is the Fraud:

    “The purchase ledger clerk of Painswick Ltd has been channeling paymentsto suppliers in to his own bank account by altering bank account details of the relevant suppliers on the BACS masterfile. In order to disguise this activity the purchase ledger clerk has:
    — Posted the relevant invoices to the purchase ledger twice. One entry has been made correctly to the relevant expense account whilst the other has been made to a suspense account.
    — Matched and removed the duplicate invoices and payments before the monthly reconciliation of supplier accounts is performed. “

    This is the Fraud, can’t figure out what the hell is happening here, except for the fact that he changed the suppliers’ bank accounts to his own accounts in Painswick’s BACS masterfile so that the payments made to the supplier go to his account. I maybe wrong, but still can’t figure out the latter stuff…..WHAT the hell is going on here?

    October 7, 2010 at 8:20 am #69074
    appadoov9
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    I guess that the fact that the purchase ledger clerk has matched and removed duplicate invoices is also a fraud as he does so only before monthly reconciliation is done.

    He accounts invoices twice, say an invoice of USD 10,000.

    dr profit and loss 10000
    cr bank 10000

    dr suspense 10000
    cr bank 10000

    One 10000 will go to the supplier and the other 10000 to the clerk bank account.
    I just said what i thought, correct me if im wrong.

    October 7, 2010 at 9:12 am #69075
    wrathofheaven1
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Correct!!
    But one point though.

    If he has changed the bank account from the supplier’s to his own in the BACS system, how is the normal payment made to the supplier? Shouldn’t both payments go to the accountant’s bank account? :S

    October 7, 2010 at 12:42 pm #69076
    wrathofheaven1
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    I think I got it 😀
    Here are the steps:

    1) Record two invoices of $10,000 each, leading to payables of $20,000, making the credit side of trial balance heavy by this $20,000.

    2) DR Profit/loss $10,000
    CR Bank $10,000

    3) Change the bank account no. of supplier in BACS to his own account.

    4) DR Suspense $10000
    CR Bank $10000

    5) Invoices matched with the accounts and removed.

    Correct me if I am wrong

    October 8, 2010 at 8:50 am #69077
    appadoov9
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Yes thats right.Please give me a feedback after explanation by your teacher for the challenge

    October 12, 2010 at 6:00 pm #69078
    wrathofheaven1
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Here is the Answer

    DR Purchase(expense) 100
    DR Suspense 100
    CR Supplier 200

    Then, the payment:
    DR Supplier 200
    CR Bank 200

    While matching, he removes the duplicate invoice and after that when the new invoice comes he records that in the place of the Suspense a/c. This is a recurring fraud and will continue until the accountant decides to run away.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kyubatuu on MA Chapter 6 Questions Inventory Control
  • hhys on PM Chapter 14 Questions More variance analysis
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • bizuayehuy on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in