*** F9 June 2011 Exam was … Post your comments here and vote in Instant Poll ***

This topic has 332 replies, 133 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by joevassallo.

Viewing 25 posts - 51 through 75 (of 333 total)

← 1 2 3 4 … 12 13 14 →

Author
Posts
June 9, 2011 at 2:10 pm #84005
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
It was a bit lengthy.Too many thinks to do in just 3 hours.
June 9, 2011 at 2:10 pm #84006
y.prananv
Member
- Topics: 5
- Replies: 11
me too I wanted to know if we had to take incremental fixed costs for number 1 since we were given the total costs each year???
June 9, 2011 at 2:12 pm #84007
jay14
Member
- Topics: 29
- Replies: 63
for incoporating risk, i wrote about capm and risk adjusted discount rate, expected values and simulation..pls was i just writing complete crap?..who knows?
June 9, 2011 at 2:16 pm #84008
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 12
Too lengthy indeed. I couldn’t remember anything about incorporating risk and didn’t write much about scrip dividends… hope to get 50%..
June 9, 2011 at 2:20 pm #84009
05008967
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 54
@tzxsean said:
I work to nearest 1000 after every steps instead 1 final figure
I rounded up to the 1000 when calculating the PV in the final lines.
June 9, 2011 at 2:24 pm #84010
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 52
@05008967 said:
I rounded up to the 1000 when calculating the PV in the final lines.
if asked to work to the nearest 000, for each step you need to round ,however ,penalty will not heavy, i think no more than 2 marks as long as you did it in the right way
June 9, 2011 at 2:29 pm #84011
garygood
Member
- Topics: 3
- Replies: 14
My IRR was aroung 8.something%, crap!
Far too much to write. And yes I started with working out the damn EOQ, then realised it wasn’t that. Had to leave bits out. Started with Q4, whch I thought was reasonably doable.
Completely exhausted, fingers crossed for this one, but it doesn’t look good for me, I must admit.
June 9, 2011 at 2:34 pm #84012
garygood
Member
- Topics: 3
- Replies: 14
For sensitivity, I waffled about beta, probabilities (EV) and sensitivity.
God, when I think back, I could have done so much better.
June 9, 2011 at 2:36 pm #84013
avinashbhatia
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 8
IN QUESTION NO 1 : I GOT NPV OF 981 POSITIVE
QUESTION 2 WACC:11.2 % AND 10.45 %
Q3:RIDICULOUS 😀
Q4:FWD MARKET 390 MONEY MARKET 394$ SO FWD IS PREFERABLE
IN EOQ QUESTION : EARLY SETTLEMENT DISCOUNT 902700 AND BULKDISCOUNT 901600 SO BULK IS PREFERABLE
TELL ME AM I RYTE ?
June 9, 2011 at 2:42 pm #84014
ali.hbc@gmail.com
Member
- Topics: 3
- Replies: 34
Paper was easy but time pressured….
I made some blunders in paper so i will penalise surely….
1. In question 1, incremental Working capital is not taken as a consequence of applying inflation rate moreover i made calculation to “million rupees” instead of “000”
2. In question 2, i did (1-tax) with debt included in WACC but tax were already less in the rate moreover when calculation IRR, i didnot take interest after tax….
I made such blunders after great knowledge of F9, and i am not believing that what done even i known all.
Luck really really matters.
May God, i got 50….
June 9, 2011 at 2:42 pm #84015
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
Avinash Bhatia, Q1 was positive but a rather different figure at my end. Q2, i think its just a rounding factor, well done on Q3 and Q4 Same answer
June 9, 2011 at 2:42 pm #84016
garygood
Member
- Topics: 3
- Replies: 14
On hedging I think I got the forward rate cheaper than the market hedge.
June 9, 2011 at 2:45 pm #84017
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
@avinashbhatia said:
IN QUESTION NO 1 : I GOT NPV OF 981 POSITIVE
QUESTION 2 WACC:11.2 % AND 10.45 %
Q3:RIDICULOUS 😀
Q4:FWD MARKET 390 MONEY MARKET 394$ SO FWD IS PREFERABLE
IN EOQ QUESTION : EARLY SETTLEMENT DISCOUNT 902700 AND BULKDISCOUNT 901600 SO BULK IS PREFERABLE
TELL ME AM I RYTE ?
Avinash Bhatia, Q1 was positive but a rather different figure at my end. Q2, i think its just a rounding factor, well done on Q3 and Q4 Same answer
June 9, 2011 at 2:56 pm #84018
avinashbhatia
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 8
alifarooqi2000
you got the same answers of bulk n early settlement ?
June 9, 2011 at 3:08 pm #84019
avinashbhatia
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 8
incremental w.c was
in year 1:22
2:23
3:23.5
4:750
is this right ?
June 9, 2011 at 3:17 pm #84020
jshields
Participant
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 13
Well I seem to have done something wrong on Q4 as lots of people seem to think that Bulk purchase was a viable option, I calculated that though it was better than the prompt payment discount it was still worse than there current method so they shouldn’t take either option.
June 9, 2011 at 3:18 pm #84021
avinashbhatia
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 8
for f.c i applied 3% inflation
1000×1.03 =1030
1800×1.03^2=1909
and so on . . .
does anybody of u have done this type of calculation
June 9, 2011 at 3:18 pm #84022
uid0191
Member
- Topics: 1
- Replies: 30
@avinashbhatia said:
incremental w.c was
in year 1:22
2:23
3:23.5
4:750
is this right ?
i thought 750 should be in year 0?
June 9, 2011 at 3:19 pm #84023
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
sooooo lengthy…….whats going to happened in f7………..afraid
June 9, 2011 at 3:19 pm #84024
avinashbhatia
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 8
yea 750 in year 0
but working capital can never be consumed and it should be recoverd in year 4
750
June 9, 2011 at 3:20 pm #84025
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
Hope I can pass it.
June 9, 2011 at 3:23 pm #84026
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
Q2: For the first bond there was no interest rate or maturity date, did we just assume a rate and maturity?
June 9, 2011 at 3:27 pm #84027
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 52
@carmonkey said:
Q2: For the first bond there was no interest rate or maturity date, did we just assume a rate and maturity?
if no maturity date ,it should be an irredeemable debt? its interest rate = 100x nominal rate / market value
June 9, 2011 at 3:30 pm #84028
05008967
Member
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 54
@avinashbhatia said:
yea 750 in year 0
but working capital can never be consumed and it should be recoverd in year 4
750
I also had (750) in year zero and recovered in year 4. There were no other adjustments to WC required.
Do you remember on the WACC question, when including the bonds did you have these figures…
(250m/250m + 62.4m + 40m)*Ke ?
June 9, 2011 at 3:31 pm #84029
Anonymous
Inactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
maaaaaaan!!! thanks tho..! but there was no interest rate though? there was a cost of capital of 7% so used that as the d/f – oh its not looking good, thought i had WACC in the bag too 🙁
Author
Posts

Viewing 25 posts - 51 through 75 (of 333 total)

← 1 2 3 4 … 12 13 14 →

The topic ‘*** F9 June 2011 Exam was … Post your comments here and vote in Instant Poll ***’ is closed to new replies.

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books