*** F4 December 2013 Exam was.. Post your comments ***

Irish Variant (very similar to UK).

Hopefully I passed. Few observations;
1) tort question was very long for both duty of care and standard of care.
2) q8 , i said it was validly incorporated due to regular course of dealing Miley v RJ Mckenzie, went through list actual notice, quality of notice, time of notice then regular course of dealing, part b) i guessed that was a construction clause so advised he could sue
3) q9, was a nice agency question, tipped to come up by our lecturer.
4) q10 priority of payments / fixed / floating charge wasnt too bad, i said floating charge invalid and was unsecured because created within 6 months of liquidation, could be wrong.
5) had studied offer inside out, wasn’t expecting consideration….

hope passed, answered rest of questions with as much common sense as possible….hopefully…

i thought the exam was very easy and straight forward , to be honest all i did was watch MIke’s lessons and notes , worked a treat ,
i was dreading this exam , but you know what , i think i will miss listen to Mike’s lessons now, fantastic way of teaching , ive thoroughly enjoyed this time we spent together Mike 😛
Bruna

I thought no too as they were outside the scope of administrative duties of the company. The other two were enforceable for this reason however… Eeek!

I put the contract was with the company and not with chu. I did say that the company could sue chu tho for this

hi regarding duty of care i mention about specific performance injunction quantrum merit do you think it was irelevant to the question

I did enjoy the paper to be honest but you never what these guys are looking for but I believe have tried my best

Mr Mike …i have learnt the meaning of Consideration by heart..i did u proud LOL..

100% agreedd.. hip hip hoorayy Mikee 🙂

thank GOD it was reachable

@ tallaghtoop
question 9, the exclusion clause wasnt incoporated because the UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT, renders void all clauses and terms disclaiming for death or injury, in this case injury.

I am looking for the contact info of the girl I met in Denver who was taking F4. You had previously lived in Jersey and I am a Brit. I have some questions I wanted to ask you about materials for studying. not sure if you will see to but is worth a try!
If you see this I would love to talk to you, my email is pcjg1@hotmail.com

I thought the exclusion clause one had a grey area in it which was a bit unfair. They said he didnt sign the contract but he went there regularly ie four times before. Exclusion clauses if you deal with them daily then they should know the clause so no problem if dont sign it but if its only 3-4 times over 5 years then it wouldnt be valid if they dont sign it. I took the word ‘regularly’ to mean four times in the past year , but why put this grey area into an important exam. It could mean he takes it regularly to that garage and no other and it could well be 4 times in the past 5 years and then the exclusion clause it not valid.

One thing interesting the English law exam did not contain a single English name. If you look at top 100 English names doubt question 8 abid, question 9 chu , or question 10 ina , jo and ko would be listed. Never met anyone with these names in my life and I live in diverse London, would find it easier if used more common names as kept having to refer to paper to see how abid was spelt, I kept putting adib.