- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
- Posts
As per IFRS 9, non payment is a indicator that outstanding receivable are credit impaired. A loss allowance should be recognized equal to difference between gross carrying amount of receivables and PV of expected future cashflows receivable. Any increase or decrease in loss allowance is charged to PNL
Sir is the above para referring to stage 3 of expected credit loss model?
Secondly, loss allowance is stage 3 is recognized at PV of losses that arise because borrower defaults on their obligation throughout life of financial instrument OR is loss allowance in stage 3 is recognized equal to difference between gross carrying amount of receivables and PV of expected future cashflows receivable. Any increase or decrease in loss allowance is charged to PNL?
Stage 2 and 3 are more or less the same – compare the previous allowance with the new allowance and write the difference off in the P&L.
Keep it simple in the exam, as always. 🙂
More importantly, remember that you don’t use the 3 stage model for trade receivables.
1) Sir why not to use stage 3 models for trade receivables? In a past exam question examiner has used stage 3 model for trade receivables
2) For stage 3, is it correct or not to write that : loss allowance in stage 3 is recognized at PV of losses that arise because borrower defaults on their obligation throughout life of financial instrument / receivable
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.