- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
John Moffat.
John Moffat.-
Posts
-
abdulbasit16
- Topics: 165
- Replies: 155
- ☆☆☆
Sir question 18 in the above link seems very confusing to me. They have said in the question that the REVENUE is going to increase by 20%. So how have they applied 20% to the earnings figure. Secondly the company is not listed so we shud take 50 or 60% of PE ratio of listed company. But they have taken the actual figure. :/
And one more thing. If we are given an earnings amount for 1 year ahead and current earnings. Do we take current earnings or future earnings for the PE ratio method of business valuation?
John Moffat
- Topics: 57
- Replies: 51298
- ☆☆☆☆☆
You must not post links on this website to copyright material – it is illegal.
You do not say what answer they have given for Q 18, but they should have multiplied the 20X4 earnings of 2.8 by the PE ratio of 15.2, which gives $4.26.
Revenue increasing by 20% is of no relevance.Using a lower PE for an unquoted company is normal but is certainly not a rule. In an MCQ such as this you cannot be expected to use a lower PE unless the question specifically told you how much lower.
You apply the PE to the current earnings to get a current market value.
abdulbasit16
- Topics: 165
- Replies: 155
- ☆☆☆
Sorry sir.
Oh okay, right.
Thanks.John Moffat
- Topics: 57
- Replies: 51298
- ☆☆☆☆☆
You are welcome 🙂
abdulbasit16
John Moffat- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.