Skip to content

Ask the Tutor ACCA LW

Dividend

SSalar6y ago
Hello Mike, As a general concept dividend is declared out of "accumulated realised profits less accumulated realised losses". What if we had bunch of revalued assets which are depreciated on their historical costs. This really reduces our profits so a little left to be distributed as dividend. No? I'd appreciate it if you could illuminate me. Thank you.
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor6y ago#1
The revaluation surplus is, of course, an unrealised profit and that surplus is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the revalued asset But, of course, you're correct! That surplus / excess depreciation is reducing the realised profits for each year and thus reducing the extent of profits available for distribution But that's where the law steps in! As each year passes that excess depreciation on the unrealised revaluation surplus is treated as though it were a realised profit So when calculating the extent of distributable profits, in its simplest way, the year's figure for profit after tax is then increased by the amount of that excess depreciation caused by the revaluation of the asset Is that ok!
SSalar6y ago#2
So.... you are telling that revaluation surplus is an realised profit and its subsequent extra depreciation is realised loss, ergo they have cancelling out effect???
SSalar6y ago#3
@salardehbashi said: So.... you are telling that revaluation surplus is "treated" as a realised profit and its subsequent extra depreciation also is "treated" as a realised loss, ergo they have cancelling out effect???
SSalar6y ago#4
So each year, to compensate for the excess depreciation, we record the following entry: Dr. Revaluation Surplus Cr. Profit for the year
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor6y ago#5
Your last post is correct Your second post I shall ignore Your first post is incorrect The revaluation surplus is, at date of revaluation, unrealised But as time passes, each year a part of that revaluation becomes realised If I revalue an asset by $20,000 and that revalued asset has an effective remaining useful life of 10 years, then, over that 10 year period that revalued amount becomes realised … at the rate of $2,000 each year So, as per your last post, we COULD, if we wanted to follow 'good practice', transfer that excess annual $2,000 depreciation out of Revaluation Reserve into Profit of Loss Reserve / Retained Earnings But we may choose not to follow 'good practice' and simply not do that transfer But, even though we didn't make the transfer, for the purposes of calculating distributable profits, we treat that annual excess depreciation as though it were a realised profit and, thus, include it as distributable OK?
SSalar6y ago#6
Oh thank you. Now I remembered it from F3 ! Dr. Revaluation Reserve Cr. Retained Earnings
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor6y ago#7
Perfect!
Sign into reply to this topic.