- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
MikeLittle.
MikeLittle.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
ayulas
- Topics: 1
- Replies: 0
- ☆
deferred tax liability isnt interest paying. is it logical to include it as part of capital employed?
pls i need clarification
MikeLittle
- Topics: 26
- Replies: 22650
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Quite some debate on this! Include or exclude – but be consistent. Your point about not-interest bearing adds on to the point that it isn’t represented by funding in the form of cash so exclusion is justifiable
MikeLittleViewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.