Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Dec 2016 Exam – Maykorn
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- February 23, 2017 at 5:24 pm #373915
Maykorn Co prepares its financial statements to 30 September each year.
On 30 September 20X3, Maykorn Co moved out of one of its properties and put it up for sale. The property met the criteria as held for sale on 30 September 20X3. On 1 October 20X2, the property had a carrying amount of $2.6m and a remaining life of 20 years. The property is held under the revaluation model. The property was expected to sell for a gross amount of $2.5m with selling costs estimated at $50,000.What is the total amount charged to Maykorn Co’s profit or loss in respect of the property for the year ended 30 September 20X3?
? $130,000
? $180,000
? $150,000
? $100,000Answer: Property is depreciated by $130,000 ($2,600,000/20) giving a carrying amount of $2,470,000. When classed as held for sale, property is revalued to its fair value $2,500,000 (as it is carried under the revaluation model, $30,000 would go to revaluation surplus). Held for sale assets are measured at the lower of carrying amount (now $2,500,000) and fair value less costs to sell ($2,500,000 – $50,000 = $2,450,000) giving an impairment of $50,000. Total charge to profit or loss is $130,000 + $50,000 = $180,000.
If the revaluation surplus was previously increased by the revaluation per $30,000 when a following impairment occurred why not reduce the revaluation surplus by $30,000 and charge to P+L the remaining $20,000?
February 23, 2017 at 6:36 pm #373919“why not reduce the revaluation surplus by $30,000 and charge to P+L the remaining $20,000”
Because that wouldn’t comply with the guidance / rule established by IFRS 5
OK?
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Dec 2016 Exam – Maykorn’ is closed to new replies.