• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Dec 2016 Exam – Maykorn

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Dec 2016 Exam – Maykorn

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by AvatarMikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 23, 2017 at 5:24 pm #373915
    Avatarabeckman
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Maykorn Co prepares its financial statements to 30 September each year.
    On 30 September 20X3, Maykorn Co moved out of one of its properties and put it up for sale. The property met the criteria as held for sale on 30 September 20X3. On 1 October 20X2, the property had a carrying amount of $2.6m and a remaining life of 20 years. The property is held under the revaluation model. The property was expected to sell for a gross amount of $2.5m with selling costs estimated at $50,000.

    What is the total amount charged to Maykorn Co’s profit or loss in respect of the property for the year ended 30 September 20X3?
    ? $130,000
    ? $180,000
    ? $150,000
    ? $100,000

    Answer: Property is depreciated by $130,000 ($2,600,000/20) giving a carrying amount of $2,470,000. When classed as held for sale, property is revalued to its fair value $2,500,000 (as it is carried under the revaluation model, $30,000 would go to revaluation surplus). Held for sale assets are measured at the lower of carrying amount (now $2,500,000) and fair value less costs to sell ($2,500,000 – $50,000 = $2,450,000) giving an impairment of $50,000. Total charge to profit or loss is $130,000 + $50,000 = $180,000.

    If the revaluation surplus was previously increased by the revaluation per $30,000 when a following impairment occurred why not reduce the revaluation surplus by $30,000 and charge to P+L the remaining $20,000?

    February 23, 2017 at 6:36 pm #373919
    AvatarMikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “why not reduce the revaluation surplus by $30,000 and charge to P+L the remaining $20,000”

    Because that wouldn’t comply with the guidance / rule established by IFRS 5

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Dec 2016 Exam – Maykorn’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in