• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Cut off assertion

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AA Exams › Cut off assertion

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by Ken Garrett.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 26, 2018 at 8:57 am #454033
    ayotunde1
    Participant
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Question on cut off. If the auditor finds out that after his receivable circularisation, the balances of the client and their debtor is not in sync, he checks the post year end bank statement and finds out that the money had just dropped, is he going to adjust the financial statement for this?
    Kindly further explain why auditors need to check pre year end and post year end statements for the audit of receivable and payable balances , I find it hard to understand why this should be an appropriate audit procedure.
    Thank you.

    May 26, 2018 at 11:54 am #454088
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10591
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    What does “just dropped” mean? If the client has not paid in the cash by year end, it is not cash on the SOFP.

    There isn’t a lot of point in checking statements sent to customers as these are generated internally. Checking statements from suppliers allows you to verify that the liability at year end is accurate etc. I don’t think it particularly verifies cut-off.

    May 26, 2018 at 12:07 pm #454093
    ayotunde1
    Participant
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Thank you for your reply, By ‘drop off ‘ I mean for example a cheque in transit being cleared, which was apparently the cause of the difference between the debtors balance and the clients receivable balance.

    Does it verifies accuracy or completeness instead?

    May 26, 2018 at 5:09 pm #454129
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10591
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Looking at supplier statements helps with accuracy, existence, completeness, obligation and cut-off.

    So, a very useful test.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in