• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

Currency futures – No. of contracts required

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Currency futures – No. of contracts required

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 2, 2023 at 12:43 pm #678020
    tang.kt
    Participant
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Relevant information:
    Transaction type: A foreign currency payment $12,750,000 in May (local currency in EUR)
    Spot price at 28-Feb: 1.2311
    Futures contract: Mar at 1.2774, Jun at 1.2143, contract size EUR62,500

    Using the ‘long method’, I found out that when calculating no. of contracts required, Kaplan study text, Kaplan exam kit and BPP workbook gives different approach, mainly:

    1) Using predicted futures price at transaction date in May (Kaplan exam kit = past exams)
    = [ $12,750,000 / (1.2143 + ((1.2311 – 1.2143) x ¼ x 1 period) ) ] / EUR62,500
    = 167.41 or 167 contracts (under-hedged exist)

    2) Use directly the futures contract rate at maturity in Jun (In study text/workbook)
    = [ $12,750,000 / 1.2143 ] / EUR62,500 = 167.998, or 168 contracts (no under-hedged)

    Though the difference is minimal, it is really confusing (+frustrating) because none of the study material clarify if it is acceptable in the exam to use any one of the two approaches (of course I will choose to follow exam kit as the answer is written by examiner). Please kindly advice.

    Furthermore, is it acceptable to ‘round up’ the no. of contracts required (i.e. the 167.41 contracts above to 168 contracts) to save the hassle of going through the amount not hedged?

    Looking forward for your reply and thanks in-advance!

    Best regards,
    Kenny

    February 2, 2023 at 5:25 pm #678181
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 56
    • Replies: 51879
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is acceptable to round the number of contracts either way, and the examiner will always accept (in your example) either 167 or 168 whichever he chooses to show in his answer (his answers are only suggested answers and there is rarely just one ‘perfectly correct’ answer to Paper AFM questions.

    Whichever way you choose to round, you should always at least mention the existence of any over or under hedge.

    (Have you watched my free lectures on this?)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kamo7293 on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hi?n on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Ken Garrett on ACCA AB Chapter 19 – Macroeconomics – Questions

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy