- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
.
- Posts
We say that if cost of debt and cost of equity increases then WACC too increases but another statement is that WACC falls with higher gearing, so high gearing ultimately means high cost of debt and here due to high cost of debt WACC will increase so isn’t this statement contradicting with the first statement which says that if cost of debt and cost of equity increases then WACC also increases?
You must watch my lectures on this – I explain it in full with graphs.
The cost of debt will always be lower than the cost of equity and therefore more gearing means more (cheap) cost of debt and therefore lower WACC.
Higher gearing results in lower WACC, but this will hold true ONLY in M&M with tax theory?
Secondly if any mcq comes in exam related to capital structure theories, and if its not mentioned that use traditional theory or M&M with tax or M&M without tax theory then which theory shall we assume?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.