- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by .
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › ACCA Forums › General ACCA Forums › Corporate governance comes to sport
Or does it?
“The International Cricket Council (ICC) has appointed India’s Shashank Manohar as its first independent chairman.
The 58-year-old, the sole nominee and elected unopposed, will begin his two-year term with the sport’s governing body immediately.
Manohar had resigned as the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Tuesday.”
Shouldn’t it be the case that the independent chair is a person with no prior connections with the body to which the chair is elected
I don’t know how close BCCI is to ICC but I can’t imagine that they are totally unrelated
The BCCI basically controls the ICC, ever since their power sharing agreement with Cricket Australia and The England and Wales Cricket Board.
The previous ICC chairman N. Srinivasan, held the post of BCCI President and ICC chairmen concurrently.
Thanks for this 🙂
The Supreme Court of India ordered N. Srinivasan to quit as BCCI Chairman, when he came under investigation for several scams and corruption cases.
It was a sad day for International Cricket when the three most powerful boards joined forces to rule them all.
That should surely have stream-lined the process and made everything more easy to accomplish!
Bribery, corruption, scams, match-fixing, confusing your sons believing them to be your nephews – all sorts of exciting activities
