• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Bad debt in Factoring

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Bad debt in Factoring

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 20, 2021 at 10:58 pm #621263
    John1998m
    Participant
    • Topics: 73
    • Replies: 40
    • ☆☆

    I am having a problem calculating savings of bad debts so my question is that could you please tell me what is the correct % for saving of bad debts? Is it 3% or 2%?

    Isn’t that correct the difference between these two %age would be the saving of bad debt such as 700,000 x 1% = 7000?

    [Question]
    Velmin Co has a turnover of $700,000. Receivable days are currently 48 despite the
    company only offering 30-days’ credit and bad debts are currently 3% of turnover. Velmin
    Co finances its receivables using its overdraft which has an annual interest cost of 8%.
    Velmin is considering the use of a factor.

    The factor would charge 4% of turnover for a non?recourse agreement and would expect to reduce receivable days to 34 and bad debts to 2%. The factor would lend Velmin 75% of the outstanding receivables and would charge Velmin 1% above their current overdraft interest cost. It is anticipated that using the factor would reduce administration costs by $6,000 per annum.

    Required:
    Evaluate whether or not Velmin Co should use the factor.

    May 21, 2021 at 9:37 am #621291
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is non-recourse factoring and so the company will end up suffering no bad debts and will therefore save 3%.

    I do explain the difference between with-recourse and non-recourse factoring in my free lectures.

    May 21, 2021 at 3:47 pm #621349
    John1998m
    Participant
    • Topics: 73
    • Replies: 40
    • ☆☆

    If it were with recourse then the company would have saved 1% (3 – 2). Is that right?

    May 22, 2021 at 7:42 am #621382
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Bad debt in Factoring’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on ACCA F2 Revision
  • sanjarmakh on PPE – Depreciation – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • sanjarmakh on PPE – Depreciation – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • hunaiza.19 on ACCA F2 Revision
  • kita0553 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in