• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Bad debt in Factoring

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Bad debt in Factoring

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 20, 2021 at 10:58 pm #621263
    John1998m
    Participant
    • Topics: 73
    • Replies: 40
    • ☆☆

    I am having a problem calculating savings of bad debts so my question is that could you please tell me what is the correct % for saving of bad debts? Is it 3% or 2%?

    Isn’t that correct the difference between these two %age would be the saving of bad debt such as 700,000 x 1% = 7000?

    [Question]
    Velmin Co has a turnover of $700,000. Receivable days are currently 48 despite the
    company only offering 30-days’ credit and bad debts are currently 3% of turnover. Velmin
    Co finances its receivables using its overdraft which has an annual interest cost of 8%.
    Velmin is considering the use of a factor.

    The factor would charge 4% of turnover for a non?recourse agreement and would expect to reduce receivable days to 34 and bad debts to 2%. The factor would lend Velmin 75% of the outstanding receivables and would charge Velmin 1% above their current overdraft interest cost. It is anticipated that using the factor would reduce administration costs by $6,000 per annum.

    Required:
    Evaluate whether or not Velmin Co should use the factor.

    May 21, 2021 at 9:37 am #621291
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is non-recourse factoring and so the company will end up suffering no bad debts and will therefore save 3%.

    I do explain the difference between with-recourse and non-recourse factoring in my free lectures.

    May 21, 2021 at 3:47 pm #621349
    John1998m
    Participant
    • Topics: 73
    • Replies: 40
    • ☆☆

    If it were with recourse then the company would have saved 1% (3 – 2). Is that right?

    May 22, 2021 at 7:42 am #621382
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Bad debt in Factoring’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • dubsforbill on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • saaranitinchandratre on Activity Based Costing part 3 – Advantages of, and problems with – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • adam on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on PM Chapter 7 Questions Pricing
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 3 – Advantages of, and problems with – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in