• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

New! Lectures for ACCA AAA September 2022 Exams are now available >>

New! BPP Books for ACCA September 2022 Exams are now available, get your discount code >>

Audit risk and Business risk mark allocation

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Audit risk and Business risk mark allocation

  • This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 6 months ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2021 at 9:14 pm #642522
    chinedu123
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    Hello,

    Please does the “3 marks per point count for both audit and business risks or only aduit”?

    Also, risk of material misstatement, is that mainly audit risk or analytical calculations on the scenario.

    Thank you

    December 5, 2021 at 8:47 am #642569
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 6097
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    See in my post here – the one on February 27 – where I explain making for the evaluation of the risks of material misstatement (including marks for materiality and analytical procedures)
    https://opentuition.com/topic/aaa-exam-2

    In short – evaluation of RoMM is max 3 each – materiality and results of analytical procedures are on top of that at 1/2 mark each calculation/trend but capped – say at 3 and 4 marks respectiviely.
    Some RoMM will merit only 2 marks max because there is less to evaluate – e.g. disclosure risks.

    Business risks you should work to only 2 marks max each – see https://www.accaglobal.com/hk/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-exams-study-resources/p7/technical-articles/exam-tech2.html

    December 5, 2021 at 4:13 pm #642625
    Noah098
    • Topics: 936
    • Replies: 352
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    ma’am can you clear the marking scheme for materiality calculation, I thought there was 0.5marks for using any one becnhcamark and calculating the figure, and another 0.5 for stating if its material or not =1 mark for materiality statement.

    But from your above post am scared, am wrong. Do you mean we have to use 2 benchmarks+materiality conclusion=1 mark for materiality statement?

    December 5, 2021 at 5:25 pm #642635
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 6097
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Just remind yourself by looking at the latest published answers what the examiner wants

    December 5, 2021 at 5:29 pm #642636
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 6097
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I am on a bus

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • nojwwnolife on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Lease versus Buy – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ben920331 on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Lease versus Buy – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)
  • Viktoriia.Yanchuk on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)

Copyright © 2022 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy