- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- Posts
Hi,
In the question referenced, I don’t understand the treatment of intangible assets. IAS 38 says in order to recognise an intangible asset, then it must be probable that future economic benefits will be earned. However, the text says they “have not concluded that economic benefits are likely to flow from this compound”
Given no economic benefits are confirmed, how can we call this an intangible asset?
Thanks,
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.