• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

additional depreciation

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › additional depreciation

  • This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 24, 2016 at 2:12 am #312421
    hamzaukadia
    Participant
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Hi Mike,

    I’m really struggling to come to grips in how to deal with additional depreciation in the CSOFP.

    For e.g. in the BPP ACCA revision kit (Laurel/Hardy) it states:

    – On 1 January 20X7 Hardy owned some items of equipment with a book value of $45,000 that had a fair value of $57,000. These assets were originally purchased by Hardy on 1 January 20X5 and are being depreciated over 6 years.

    The solution says 12,000 x 3/4 = 9000. I’m not sure whats going on here.

    In another question in the revision kit (J CO/ P CO), it states:

    -At the date of acquisition of P Co, the fair value of its freehold property was considered to be $400,000 greater than its value in P Co’s statement of financial position. P Co had acquired the property in January 20W0 and the buildings element (comprising 50% of the total value) is depreciated on cost over 50 years.

    the solution was to reduce $200,000 by 300 to give you £170,000 or 36/40 x $200,000. Once again I have no idea whats going.

    Help!!!!!!!!!

    Thank you

    April 24, 2016 at 7:29 am #312438
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23309
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi

    Before I can answer you I need to make a couple of guesses because you’ve not given me full information!

    In Laurel and Hardy, are we preparing financial statements to 31 December, 2009? If not, can you let me know the date of the financial statements, please?

    In P Co, I presume that by “reduce $200,000 by 300 to give you £170,000” you mean “reduce $200,000 by $30,000 to give you £170,000”

    In addition, there’s something wrong with the mathematics! 36/40 x $200,000 is $180,000 not $170,000 (that’s 34/40)

    For P Co question, I need to know the year end and I need the date of acquisition

    Give me these missing details and I’ll get back to you

    April 24, 2016 at 10:17 am #312462
    hamzaukadia
    Participant
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Hi Mike,

    My apologies.

    In Laurel and Hardy the CSOFP is at 31 December 2009.

    For P co $200,000 has been reduced by $30,000 and it is 34/40.

    The year end date is at 31 DECEMBER 20X5 and “P Co had acquired the property in January 20W0”

    Thank you

    April 24, 2016 at 12:14 pm #312472
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23309
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “In Laurel and Hardy the CSOFP is at 31 December 2009.”

    We acquired Hardy on 1 January 2007 and we’re now preparing financial statements for the year ended 31 December, 2009

    So that’s three years since acquisition

    The fair value increase was $12,000 and the remaining useful life as at date of acquisition was 4 more years.

    Of those 4 years, 3 have now passed ….. and that’s where 3/4 x $12,000 comes from

    I should have asked the date of acquisition for the P Co question but I assume that it was 1 January, 20X0

    At date of acquisition the building had a remaining useful life of 40 years and we acquired the subsidiary 6 years ago. So, since acquisition, 6 years have passed out of the remaining estimated 40 years

    Now, if we reduce $200,000 by 6/40 (or multiply by 34/40) we arrive at $170,000

    Does that do it for you?

    April 24, 2016 at 1:09 pm #312481
    hamzaukadia
    Participant
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Hi Mike.

    Thank you so much.

    Sorry if this is a silly question, but when you say 3 years have passed, which period is this?

    April 24, 2016 at 5:04 pm #312514
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23309
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    3 years to 31 December 20X7, 20X8 and 20X9

    OK?

    September 1, 2020 at 12:37 pm #582996
    hasangambler
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Thanks sir…

    September 2, 2020 at 8:16 pm #583167
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7149
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome?!?!?!?!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The topic ‘additional depreciation’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nicholas1239798 on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in