Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › *** ACCA Paper SBR March 2020 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 42 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by misbahkiran.
- AuthorPosts
- March 5, 2020 at 11:00 am #564338March 5, 2020 at 11:38 am #564360
Terrible paper.
March 5, 2020 at 1:17 pm #564376Awful
March 5, 2020 at 1:29 pm #564377What I can remember :
Q1
Functional currency – Grommits due to economic forces.
Goodwill – calculate in dinars then report at rate on date of acquisition. Bit of a twist here as they had some assets in Grommits and Dinars. I converted all to Grommits then to usd.
Impairment – why was there no average rate given? I took a punt and use 7.5 as the average between start and end.
Bonds
Amortisation calc fine with credit risk. Didn’t know how to treat the calc for the recognition of 12 months losses so took another punt on taking the expected value of losses to Pnl and offsetting asset in sofp.Q2
Provision – no legal or constructive so no.
Event after reporting period – does it impact going concern? Will it impact at depot date?Can’t remember the other accounting question
Confidentiality ethics with insider trading
Q3
Intangibles – tough one!
Seemed like the entity was using amortisation cost measurement with amortisation over useful life and business standard was fair value with annual review. Thought both were fine but didn’t agree with how the originally recognised the fair value of intangibles – seemed to only look at production costs?
Stadium
Sale and lease back.
Thought it represented a sale with a portion being retained. Calc was tricky because future dates and depn and not sure it was fully required but went for it anyway and explained IFRS 15 and control principles
Stadium barriers – far fetched but argued to capitalise as they would increase revenue through extra safety and increased attendance levels ?
Contact intangibles – amortise over contract and amend when life of intangible changes. Indicators of impairment include damage to players and roll up to larger cgu.
Q4
Waffle about sustainability and investors being conscientious and reputation damage if not. Threw in a bit about integrated reporting
Don’t aggregate provision with income for new building. And don’t recognise either of them.
Lease – tough, derecognised asset as control passed to new lease holder. Kept lease liability as not cancelled yet.
12 months lease so short term and accrue p&l?
Pension
Interest to p&l
Service (current and previous) to p&l
Remeasure to OCIcalc – take out provision for losses and take int and service to p&l
March 5, 2020 at 2:29 pm #564392Paper was better than December in my opinion more opportunity to pass. However again I feel you are tested on small niche aspects of the syllabus which is already far too broad for one exam. Overall Paper was passable if you brushed up on provisions and differences between FRS 102 and IFRS !
March 5, 2020 at 3:18 pm #564405First attempt. Its not difficult per se. The issue is the timing. There is so much content to cover and write about that there is very very limited amount of time to think. The questions I know I answered wrong is clearly because I had to rush. First time in all ACCA papers I struggle with timing. Let’s see !
March 5, 2020 at 3:25 pm #564409Your answers are almost the same as mine..
However, I’m a tad confused as to how the functional currency was determined! Guess the trick was in the final sentence!
March 5, 2020 at 3:26 pm #564410I agree it felt like there were more questions than specimen. I literally skipped 3 questions to make it and even then i didnt do 2 questions at q4. So 40 points blank. First try at sbr and i think im gonna have to repeat.
March 5, 2020 at 3:37 pm #564412What was the final sentence? I cant remember
March 5, 2020 at 3:39 pm #564413@mervewillard said:
What was the final sentence? I cant rememberIf you did not sit for the INT paper kindly ignore my message. It was related to the fact that the company pays tax in Dinars.
March 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm #564416UK paper stated to calculate GW in grommits in brackets
March 5, 2020 at 4:06 pm #564420This was my first paper based exam and I have to say, computer based is SO much easier in terms of you can structure your answer a lot better and delete/re write. In this paper one I wasn’t even given any draft paper to write notes so had to go straight into writing the answer, which made it look messy at times and not flow well.
In terms of the exam itself, this was my first time doing SBR, I thought the first half of the paper was a lot easier than the second half. Not sure if I answered correctly in terms of Dinars or Grommits but worked out goodwill and the impairment etc and translation reserve. The last question about pensions seemed very odd – I’ve learnt a lot about defined benefit scheme but I don’t feel like this question was worth a good 25 mark answer. The main issue was time keeping, mind went blank towards the end and felt very pressured to quickly write so much in the time given!March 5, 2020 at 4:06 pm #564421@adebattista said:
If you did not sit for the INT paper kindly ignore my message. It was related to the fact that the company pays tax in Dinars.I did sit int. I just dont think paying taxes in dinars is good enough of a reason to choose that currency. I thought it wouls be grommits because half wages in dinars half in grommits but they raise most of their financial resources in grommits
March 5, 2020 at 4:27 pm #564426I put Grommits too as most of their sales was in Grommits. Translated all figures to Grommits to work out foreign goodwill then translated the whole goodwill figure to dollars. Fingers crossed.
March 5, 2020 at 4:28 pm #564427It’s my first acca and Sbr paper. For the first question they didn’t give average rate but in the bbp revision kit they said ias permits closing rate for impairment translation to $. Damn I put opening rate for the impairment. Looks like I’m not going to make it for this one. The one about the barrier addition in the stadium ? is hard I think it’s expense as it doesn’t really add economic benefits and it’s cost added after asset is ready for use. And I skipped 2 whole sections on the one on restructuring costs and anyhow wrote about the ethics question on confidentiality and familiarity threat.
March 5, 2020 at 4:33 pm #564429I have the same thoughts as you but unfortunately couldn’t answer many questions due to lack of time and mental block. Some of my neighbours have already given up and were sleeping during the test.
March 5, 2020 at 4:54 pm #564433Rossacca…. I agree with a lot of what you have written. I too also took the average for the impairment as a punt.
Always after the exam I realise simple things I feel I have missed because they seem so basic/automatic at the time. So I realised at no point have I defined an asset… I was just focussing on the standards around it all. Hope I haven’t thrown away too many marks like this.
I feel there were repeated sections in this exam such as provisions and held for sale. Which are areas I am happy with. So if what I done is right, really hoping I’ve done enough
Let myself down with some of the calculations. Bonds in Q1. Only answered half that questions. Sale and lease back. I couldn’t quite focus on the proportion I was after and mentioned nothing of control of the asset. And Q4! Wow. What a disaster. No idea how to calculate the pension ( weak area for me and praying it didn’t come up) and certainly didn’t write enough to justify the 9 marks (plus 2 for professional) for the impact on PBT
I do always find my concentration lapses towards the end, so Atleast I am relatively happy with the majority of Q1 and Q2
My last exam, really hoping I’ve done enough…. I managed to score 40 in December sitting and was really winging it due to a serous lack of knowledge of the standards, which this time I really feel I have a strong grasp of.
please be my last sitting!
March 5, 2020 at 5:20 pm #564437@nieffee said:
Rossacca…. I agree with a lot of what you have written. I too also took the average for the impairment as a punt.Always after the exam I realise simple things I feel I have missed because they seem so basic/automatic at the time. So I realised at no point have I defined an asset… I was just focussing on the standards around it all. Hope I haven’t thrown away too many marks like this.
I feel there were repeated sections in this exam such as provisions and held for sale. Which are areas I am happy with. So if what I done is right, really hoping I’ve done enough
Let myself down with some of the calculations. Bonds in Q1. Only answered half that questions. Sale and lease back. I couldn’t quite focus on the proportion I was after and mentioned nothing of control of the asset. And Q4! Wow. What a disaster. No idea how to calculate the pension ( weak area for me and praying it didn’t come up) and certainly didn’t write enough to justify the 9 marks (plus 2 for professional) for the impact on PBT
I do always find my concentration lapses towards the end, so Atleast I am relatively happy with the majority of Q1 and Q2
My last exam, really hoping I’ve done enough…. I managed to score 40 in December sitting and was really winging it due to a serous lack of knowledge of the standards, which this time I really feel I have a strong grasp of.
please be my last sitting!
I feel exactly the same about everything you said here. I felt like I was repeating answers about provisions and held for sale but maybe that was correct! I wish I’d have had a bit more time just to think about what I needed to write and structure it better, could have picked up easy marks by referencing the conceptual framework maybe.
March 5, 2020 at 5:39 pm #564439It sounds like we all had similar issues, and were caught off guard in the same areas.
It’s incredibly important that this is fed back to the ACCA during your feedback so things like this get considered during the moderation of the results.
The bond question in section A really put a spanner in my exam approach as I was not expecting it would be for that many marks..
Question 4 was a bit of a horror show for me too!
Regardless, best of luck all!
March 5, 2020 at 6:27 pm #564446yeah i thought their functional currency was grommits as all sales, purch and most of their finance was in grommits and also some wages too.
I didnt see the currency that they pax in as being of an influence in this q as it stated that they were legally required to pay tax in that currency so they had no choice in the matter – also argued that even if you did take into account the tax payment that their primary economic activity in the most seemed to be in grommits.
March 5, 2020 at 7:33 pm #564455Does anyone remember any of the mark allocation …. trying to just go over how I did. I know I shouldn’t torture myself. I can’t change it now. But it does help me lol
Question 1
Functional currency (6)
Goodwill , impairment, exch loss etc (8?)
How to account for Quaver (5?)
Bonds! (11)Total 30
Question 2
Provision for restructure (6)
Related party. Wife’s shares (3?)
Stewardship? (3?)
Ethics points (6?)
Professional marks (2)Total 20
Question 3
Accounting for stadium barriers (?)
Sale and leaseback (?)
Intangible contracts, bonus, CGU (?)Total 25
Question 4
Sustainability (8)
£16m (£2 mil saving, £10m loss in sales ) and accounting for old lease (6)
Pension calculation defined Benefit
And Effect of PBT of above 2 (9)
Professional (2)Total 25
Also feel free to correct anything that’s wrong !
March 5, 2020 at 7:36 pm #564457Does anyone remember any of the mark allocation …. trying to just go over how I did. I know I shouldn’t torture myself. I can’t change it now. But it does help me lol
Question 1
Functional currency (6)
Goodwill , impairment, exch loss etc (5?)
Accounting for Crotchets customer contracts (4?)
How to account for Quaver (4?)
Bonds! (11)Total 30
Question 2
Provision for restructure (6)
Related party. Wife’s shares (3?)
Stewardship? (3?)
Ethics points (6?)
Professional marks (2)Total 20
Question 3
Accounting for stadium barriers (?)
Sale and leaseback (?)
Intangible contracts, bonus, CGU (?)Total 25
Question 4
Sustainability (8)
£16m (£2 mil saving, £10m loss in sales ) and accounting for old lease (6)
Pension calculation defined Benefit
And Effect of PBT of above 2 (9)
Professional (2)Total 25
Also feel free to correct anything that’s wrong !
March 5, 2020 at 7:38 pm #564458@katie8223 said:
This was my first paper based exam and I have to say, computer based is SO much easier in terms of you can structure your answer a lot better and delete/re write. In this paper one I wasn’t even given any draft paper to write notes so had to go straight into writing the answer, which made it look messy at times and not flow well.
In terms of the exam itself, this was my first time doing SBR, I thought the first half of the paper was a lot easier than the second half.Agree on CBE and 1st vs 2nd half.
I sat the CBE variant in the UK and it was much easier to structure and digest information. The ability to select and read only relevant sections to the question being asked was great as was being able to change between word and excel.
Reviewing all the previous exams I think the 1st half has always been easier as it has followed a similar format each time – groups and ethics.
I don’t think we can complain too much around the 2nd half because I think there is a very similar question around player registration intangibles in the past papers. I might change my mind when I get my result! 🙂
March 5, 2020 at 9:23 pm #564475My exact experience! First time sitting, paper was not hard but ran out of time. hoping for the best
March 5, 2020 at 9:25 pm #564476I know Q3 last part was 13 marks.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA Paper SBR March 2020 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.