Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA APM Advanced Performance Management Forums › *** ACCA Paper APM December 2019 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 41 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Spiro.
- AuthorPosts
- December 4, 2019 at 11:00 am #554841December 4, 2019 at 12:05 pm #554862
What topics came in this sitting?
I’m sitting in march and I’m so nervous.December 4, 2019 at 12:20 pm #554864I wish everyone success
December 4, 2019 at 1:30 pm #554877Q1 (i). Performance & Performance Measurements Evaluation based on ROI, RI and the case
Q1(ii) BGC Matrix as a Performance Management tool in general and case specifically
Q1(iii) Management Information System generally but may link to case were applicable
Q2 Calculation and Evaluation of appropriate Performance Measures (The Case)
Q3 Predicting Corporate failure using the Agenti A Score and the problems with such a toll in predicting corporate failure in respect to the case
Performance measurement Evaluation
December 4, 2019 at 1:39 pm #5548821a- Evaluation of ROI, RI and analysis
1b- BCG analysis
1c- Qualities of good information and MIS. It’s uses in different levels of management2a- Benchmarking
2b- Benchmarking
2c- BPR (JIT/Value chain integration)3a- Qualitative Argentine A score model
3b- discuss that qualitative corporate failure model
Overall, the paper was quite manageable and good enough.December 4, 2019 at 1:41 pm #554885BCG, ROI and RI, benchmark, BPR, corporate failure
December 4, 2019 at 1:46 pm #554890I never know with APM.This is my 3rd time sitting for this paper and I’m again unsure.I have the technical knowledge its just planning my answers and time which gets me everytime. Really hoping for a pass this time – fingers crossed!
December 4, 2019 at 2:04 pm #554895“Evaluate the method of benchmarking?” What did people do? Evaluate choice of company etc or evaluate the numbers? Questions seemed to want the first but appendix had additional information that seemed to support the latter
December 4, 2019 at 2:46 pm #554908I assessed the method which Selite** (whatever the name) used against the Benchmarking Process.. My conclusion was that the process was fine except that the KPIs identified did not respond to the CSFs except for one..
December 4, 2019 at 3:04 pm #554915I thought that was a bit of a trick question there as the question was to advise on the appropriateness and sufficiency of the measures in terms of the industry (not the company).
I debated what to write for a while as it listed the company objectives and CSF’s but then later it went on to say what was valued in the industry at the moment – Ie. customer satisfaction, employee knowledge etc. so I focused on these points. To be fair these items overlapped quite a bit though.
December 4, 2019 at 3:22 pm #554917The first part of question 2 I wrote about the performance measures selected in terms of the CSF
The second part I spoke about whether the direct competitor was the best to use
Was this correct???December 4, 2019 at 3:32 pm #554899Wasn’t part A to evaluate the benchmarked position and suggest additional measures? Part b I focused on benefits and disadvantages of the benchmarked method chosen and how it wasn’t inline with objectives and CSFs of the organisation..
paper was definitely manageable but think paper should be 4 hours same as SBL.
December 4, 2019 at 4:06 pm #554929I’m sure the question was ‘the sufficiency and appropriateness for the industry’ – ie. Not the company
December 4, 2019 at 4:10 pm #5549311a- I calculated and commented on the ROI as well as the RI. In both cases, I calculated it without taking the head office costs, taking the brand building and R&D cost as well as the restructuring cost. Then I also calculated and analysed the both ratios by not taking the head office costs and restructuring costs and considering the R&D and Brand building costs. Gave a short note as to why restructuring costs was not considered as the company’s senior management would give approval for shifting the business place to a prestigious place and divisional managers aren’t quite responsible for that cost. Wrote the disadvantages of ROI too. Some advantages of ROI and RI too.
1b- BCG analysis was pretty straightforward..gave two financial KPI for cash cow, star and problem child.
1C- Idk how far I’m correct but I wrote the qualities of good information, good MIS report, what information/data is required by functional managers of different levels.2a- Wrote a short note on benchmark, compared monlich or whatever company that was with the competitor sheil. Also, analysed those ratios and wrote what monlich company should focus on to achieve the ratios like sheil. Gave some 3-4 extra ratios that could be calculated in the benchmark process.
2b- Wrote specifically the advantages and disadvantages of Benchmarking against a competitor. Idk if we should write something extra than this or no.
2c- Wrote a short summary of BPR. Wrote about how to change the process of material handling/order processing to Just in time. Wrote about how to keep close relationships with 1-2 suppliers only. All of that.3a- Described Argentine’s A score model and compared it with the given scenario sletille company or whatever that company name was. Defects, mistakes….all of that!
3b- I didn’t do, because no time.I am just hoping to pass please! This is my last paper and I studied too much for it.
December 4, 2019 at 4:24 pm #554933@sanjanapaul1234 said:
1a- Then I also calculated and analysed the both ratios by not taking the head office costs and restructuring costs and considering the R&D and Brand building costs. Gave a short note as to why restructuring costs was not considered as the company’s senior management would give approval for shifting the business place to a prestigious place and divisional managers aren’t quite responsible for that cost. Wrote the disadvantages of ROI too. Some advantages of ROI and RI too.I might be completely wrong but I felt with the R&D costs and marketing/brand costs, it was eluding to potential use of EVA which being essentially an extended RI calc. these costs wouldnt be charged against expenses as they would be considered long term enhancement/value add. The wording was very specific – it lead me to believe this. Yes it didnt ask specifically but for me its too much of a coincidence.
December 4, 2019 at 4:25 pm #554934@yando said:
I assessed the method which Selite** (whatever the name) used against the Benchmarking Process.. My conclusion was that the process was fine except that the KPIs identified did not respond to the CSFs except for one..I thought that was a bit of a trick question there as the question was to advise on the appropriateness and sufficiency of the measures in terms of the industry (not the company).
I debated what to write for a while as it listed the company objectives and CSF’s but then later it went on to say what was valued in the industry at the moment – Ie. customer satisfaction, employee knowledge etc. so I focused on these points. To be fair these items overlapped quite a bit though.
December 4, 2019 at 4:44 pm #554939It was a bit tricky…wasn’t too prepared for it so will take the paper in upcoming sittings.
Good luck everyone
December 4, 2019 at 5:22 pm #554945Could someone clearly list which of the costs in Q1 (i) are treated as non-controllable?
I treated as non-controllable the Head office, R&D and building marketing brand.
What about the restructuring costs of one of the divisions (moving to new office)? Who takes the decision/responsibility for it? Probably I missed something when reading the question.December 4, 2019 at 6:06 pm #554959I feel odd that I calculated EVA in question 1. Did anyone calculate it too? I think the only way R&D costs, etc could be considered was by calculating EVA which is a modified RI. So I evaluated using ROI (all divisions were above industry average), I evaluated using the RI and also using EVA (which included lots of calculations as I had to adjust the NOPAT and the CE). My calculations were full of errors but I hope my reasoning can attract marks.
December 4, 2019 at 9:00 pm #554981Its my 11 attempt and last hopefully if I pass or not pass.
You are welcome to comment if any of my point you agree to.
Q1 a, Provided pros and cons of ROI and RI, also calculated and ROI was above the industry average always and third division had quite high ROI, I added back the headoffice cost to profit before tax, and also the R&D and Brand cost as it was invested by devisions but for company long term profit and not divisional profit, for RI I was not sure what to comment as industry average was not given,
Q1 B, I was confused what else to say as the divisions were already identified as star, cash cow and problem child? what KPI’s you guys provided?
Qa C, don’t remember what I wrote to be honest.
Q2 a, calculated measures and mentioned some are good as key for industry and their should be more KPIs for other key areas like advertising.
Q2 b, I mentioned that the right information is available and competitor is in same industry and country, however data may not be reliable as companies not share right data sometime, also the other company was quite big so should compare with company at same level.
Q2 c, few points re BPR and mentioned to used system for automation and avoid errors delay, optician should able to order directly and should have few suppliers.
Q3 a, defined A score and then defect, mistakes and system,the company was at risk.
Q3 b, couldn’t come up with many points, hardly wrote few points, like no use of financial data, it is old method and may not suitable for social media kind of industry and it is just assumption based on company behavior, what else you guys wrote?
December 4, 2019 at 10:00 pm #554985AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 46
- ☆
How may marks were allocated for q1(I) ..can you remember..was it 16 or 12?
December 4, 2019 at 11:33 pm #554989Q1 a) was 18 marks I think. Think it went 18, 16, 12 and 4 professional
December 5, 2019 at 2:34 am #554993To everyone who’s confused about question 1a regarding the Brand building costs and R&D costs-
Yes, it was leading to a long term benefit. It was mentioned in the question Appendix 1.
However, the question asked to stick specifically to ROI and RI. It didn’t ask to comment about EVA. EVA is the best method to find out the shareholders wealth because it makes adjustments to the profit and brings it closer to the cash flow which can’t be manipulated. Hence, in EVA we have to add back such expenditures leading to long term benefits to the operating profit.
However, in ROI and RI, they are a performance measurement ratio which considers the operating profit. Operating profits can be manipulated to get a better ratio (creative accounting)
Hence, in ROI and RI those divisional managers will minus those expenditures leading to long term benefits and calculate the ratio of ROI and RI.
For restructuring, since it was a questionable figure, I once considered restructuring costs and then I didn’t consider restructuring costs while calculating the ratio. And I wrote the explained that in this place restructuring costs aren’t considered because maybe the company’s senior management decides which place the business should be shifted to or located in and that divisional managers have a little say in making that decision…so…
I showed both the calculations of that restructuring costs to be on the safer side.
I am just praying that I pass this time pleaseeeee.December 5, 2019 at 4:14 am #555003How did you calculate EVA without WACC?
Because looking at question requirements I thought EVA but there was no mention for Ve and Vd… Or equity debt ratio… And then saw TOI and RI while reading the case scenario…December 5, 2019 at 5:45 am #555010@yando said:
I feel odd that I calculated EVA in question 1. Did anyone calculate it too? I think the only way R&D costs, etc could be considered was by calculating EVA which is a modified RI. So I evaluated using ROI (all divisions were above industry average), I evaluated using the RI and also using EVA (which included lots of calculations as I had to adjust the NOPAT and the CE). My calculations were full of errors but I hope my reasoning can attract marks.How did you calculate EVA without WACC?
Because looking at question requirements I thought EVA but there was no mention for Ve and Vd… Or equity debt ratio… And then saw ROI and RI while reading the case scenario… - AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA Paper APM December 2019 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.