• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** ACCA P5 September 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA APM Advanced Performance Management Forums › *** ACCA P5 September 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

  • This topic has 72 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by danielglover.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 73 total)
1 2 3 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 7, 2016 at 9:20 am #338504
    opentuition_team
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 1380
    • Replies: 1404
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Please vote in our Instant Polls about the ACCA P5 September 2016 Exam.




    Post your comments about the ACCA P5 exam below

    September 7, 2016 at 5:07 pm #338639
    opentuition_team
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 1380
    • Replies: 1404
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    sorry for slight delay 🙂 you can post your comments now, thank you 🙂

    September 7, 2016 at 5:09 pm #338643
    Ellenor
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    All in all it seemed okay, time being the most critical factor again!

    September 7, 2016 at 5:28 pm #338669
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Left 8 marks because of time.

    I struggled with profit and capital measurements. Anyone got that?

    September 7, 2016 at 5:39 pm #338678
    minaa
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    Did question 2 and 4. There were hardly any calculations. Or maybe I didn’t do it :s

    September 7, 2016 at 5:44 pm #338685
    hassan
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    I kinda panicked after seeing the length of scenarios in part b. All three were massive with technical language used in describing about that company. It was hard to absorb information and understand the requirements in time constrained environment. I found it quite hard paper after looking at past 2 attempt papers.

    September 7, 2016 at 5:47 pm #338687
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    I did the same 2. What was Q2 about?

    I did some calculation while doing VFM for Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economy. Was this required to prove that they did not achieve Value for money?

    September 7, 2016 at 6:06 pm #338714
    minaa
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    I did the same conclusion. But I couldn’t do a lot of calculations. I took the number of calls not answered as a percentage of total number of calls. I compared the company with the other two on a couple of pounts. Couldn’t do in detail though.

    September 7, 2016 at 6:07 pm #338715
    minaa
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    Also I think I spent too much time doing part one of question two. For the KPI identified I concluded that it was not a good KPI.

    September 7, 2016 at 6:13 pm #338718
    ryansm05
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    Ahhh I thought to myself the VFM was the 3 E’s but then convinced myself it wasn’t…
    That’s so frustrating!!

    First time sitting P5 for me, so not entirely sure how harsh the marking is.

    Q1 was tough. I’d hope for some decent marks for the Lean Info and CoQ/TQM. BS weaknesses wasn’t really an area I had revised, so just went with conflicting info and excludes external stakeholders whilst rambling on about the model. Capital Measurements was tough. Just made an educated guess. The performance measurements used / proposed didn’t really apply to maximising S/H wealth. I just threw out EVA and RI definition and moved swiftly on.

    Q2 was Benchmarking, and it was basically the NHS vs Bupa from what I could make out. Some of the measures were relevant, but didn’t really have much time to suggest alternatives. The Bupa type firm was a poor fit, but the tax office call centre was obviously a good comparative – hopefully some easyish marks there.

    Q4 was Transfer Pricing. I just applied the GAP mnemonic and tried to link to scenario. Then explained the weaknesses with a Market rate. Part (a) I’m convinced was missing a verb as the sentence didn’t read clearly. Was to do with CSF’s and KPI’s. Just threw whatever I could get down with 6 minutes to go.

    Not super confident, but sitting P7 Monday was definitely to the detriment of this. Just praying it’s good news in October, sick to death of exams.

    Good luck everyone.

    September 7, 2016 at 6:23 pm #338721
    minaa
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    @ryansm05 said:
    Ahhh I thought to myself the VFM was the 3 E’s but then convinced myself it wasn’t…
    That’s so frustrating!!

    First time sitting P5 for me, so not entirely sure how harsh the marking is.

    Q1 was tough. I’d hope for some decent marks for the Lean Info and CoQ/TQM. BS weaknesses wasn’t really an area I had revised, so just went with conflicting info and excludes external stakeholders whilst rambling on about the model. Capital Measurements was tough. Just made an educated guess. The performance measurements used / proposed didn’t really apply to maximising S/H wealth. I just threw out EVA and RI definition and moved swiftly on.

    Was lean info system about The 5 S model? For CoQ I wrote about cost of prevention, detection, internal failure and external failure.

    I wrote random stuff about the BSC too. Also mentioned EVA and market share. I compared all the profits under the part that mentioned return on investments. And I wrote that taking just equity is not appropriate for the calculation of ROCE or ROI. As cost of equity is higher and secondly if debt is completely ignored the company might be tempted to take even more loans which will make its gearing position bad. For this same part I also mentioned Residual income.

    I mentioned about VFM and 3Es somewhere in question one as well. :S

    September 7, 2016 at 6:28 pm #338726
    ryansm05
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    @Minaa said:
    Was lean info system about The 5 S model? For CoQ I wrote about cost of prevention, detection, internal failure and external failure.

    I wrote random stuff about the BSC too. Also mentioned EVA and market share. I compared all the profits under the part that mentioned return on investments. And I wrote that taking just equity is not appropriate for the calculation of ROCE or ROI. As cost of equity is higher and secondly if debt is completely ignored the company might be tempted to take even more loans which will make its gearing position bad. For this same part I also mentioned Residual income.

    I mentioned about VFM and 3Es somewhere in question one as well. :S

    There will be people on here better placed to answer that.

    I just thought Lean info was the Right Info > Right People > Right time by focusing on end-user, avoiding info overload and one other I’ve forgotten. I then linked it to an ERP system as I’m sure there was something on this in the Q???

    September 7, 2016 at 6:30 pm #338730
    minaa
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    Oh!!!

    September 7, 2016 at 7:23 pm #338760
    rhyscallely
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 21
    • ☆

    For the capital question in part one i basically said it should be the profit before tax/(equity + long term debt) as PBT is the most accurate controllable profit answer. Gave few examples of using different profit figure or without including debt and how it can mislead investors and grossly overstate the ROCE perecentage

    September 7, 2016 at 7:52 pm #338772
    nkhungulu05
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 56
    • ☆☆

    Its like all you chaps avoided question Q3.What was Question
    three all about

    September 7, 2016 at 8:00 pm #338778
    minaa
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    It was about ABC. I thought of attempting it but didn’t have much to write about EMA.

    September 7, 2016 at 8:11 pm #338785
    LADY RAT
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Time time time!!!!the paper was not bad but time cannot permit me…information overload was the weakness found in the paper!

    September 7, 2016 at 8:30 pm #338803
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Thought Lean Management was about TQM, Kaizen costing and Just in time… All 3 used at once control and improve performance.

    Didn’t do enough calculations and wasted too much time on number one.

    Answered 2 and 4.

    I always compare Benchmarking with Performance prism in my head, almost similar but BM doesn’t not take into account stakeholder satisfaction and contribution. So mentioned that as a negative.

    September 7, 2016 at 9:30 pm #338833
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    I think so too. As I used same approach.

    September 7, 2016 at 9:38 pm #338712
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Time pressure was an issue.
    Question 1:
    Problems to implement BS
    Problems with given KPIs
    Profit and capital employed – different calculations implications
    TQM
    Lean system

    Question 4
    Benchmarking in healthcare call center answer to meet objectives
    VFM
    Comparision state-owned and private call center performance.

    Question 2
    Transfer pricing oriented to external market
    Current transfer pricing policy
    Impact of new CSF (buy almost internally)

    Question 3
    ABC + KPIs

    As question 1 took most time, I had to skip question 3 only because it looked lengthy.
    Completed 60% of question 2.

    My second attempt. After exam, it seems not as difficult as seemed before. But as usual it was difficult what the examiner wants.

    September 7, 2016 at 10:36 pm #338848
    suresh320
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    The paper was overwhelming. After u attempt Question 1 u left drain. Too muchard to do and do little time. U really have to earn every mark in the paper.

    I am very disappointed not in myself but the way the examiner are setting these papers.

    September 7, 2016 at 10:54 pm #338853
    bham
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 19
    • ☆

    Time pressured paper, part 2 questions scenarios are long.

    September 8, 2016 at 3:14 am #338871
    maineventqk
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    Does anyone else think that June 16 was way easier than this? And I only got 46. Am I screwed this time or what. Might as well start preparing for December now.

    The jokes on me. I actually failed to read up on syllabus updates and assumed prism and beyond budget were the sure bets this time. Don’t do silly sxxx like me.

    So in q1 I wrote two points on how prism is better than BSc! You think I’ll get any marks?

    September 8, 2016 at 3:17 am #338873
    vinai
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    @tinusunit said:
    Thought Lean Management was about TQM, Kaizen costing and Just in time… All 3 used at once control and improve performance.

    Didn’t do enough calculations and wasted too much time on number one.

    Answered 2 and 4.

    I always compare Benchmarking with Performance prism in my head, almost similar but BM doesn’t not take into account stakeholder satisfaction and contribution. So mentioned that as a negative.

    I don’t think mentioning performance prism was a good idea as it was taken out of the syllabus for this sitting

    September 8, 2016 at 4:18 am #338883
    maineventqk
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    @ryansm05 said:

    Q2 was Benchmarking, and it was basically the NHS vs Bupa from what I could make out. Some of the measures were relevant, but didn’t really have much time to suggest alternatives. The Bupa type firm was a poor fit, but the tax office call centre was obviously a good comparative – hopefully some easyish marks there.

    Not super confident, but sitting P7 Monday was definitely to the detriment of this. Just praying it’s good news in October, sick to death of exams.

    Good luck everyone.

    You mean the benchmarked call centre was a tax office one? I must have missed read it completely. I thought it was another govt HEALTHCARE centre. Must have been the panic button. I only left 35 min for that qn.

    Btw you are P7 student, can you compare the difficulty of P7 to P2 and P5? I’m struggling with P5 but hated P2 which is why I never thought about P7.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 73 total)
1 2 3 →
  • The topic ‘*** ACCA P5 September 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in